Norwood Healthcare
Norwood, Massachusetts · CCN 225343
22 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 198
- Surveys
- 22
- Harm or worse
- 9
- Immediate jeopardy
- 5
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. 1 of these were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 170
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- NEXT STEP HEALTHCARE
- County
- Norfolk
- Medicare-certified since
- 1989
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 96 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Massachusetts.
Last survey on record
May 5, 2026
188 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.48 | 3.59 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.88 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 25.0% | 34.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $110,264 across 5 penalties
- Special focus
- SFF Candidate
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J57.4% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G22.9% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3247.1% | E2029.4% | F57.4% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B45.9% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6566×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6895×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6583×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5842×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Norwood Healthcare, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF656Feb 9, 2026
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop, maintain, and implement an active, interdisciplinary, person centered care plan to address a known elopement risk for one Resident (#83), in a sample of 25, despite documented severe cognitive impairment (BIMS=3 on 11/24/25), exit seeking behavior, and a high risk elopement score of 14 (11/18/25). The facility resolved the elopement/wandering care plan on 11/28/25 without IDT review or subsequent risk reassessment, and did not implement effective interventions (e.g., wander alert specifications, door/elevator supervision) consistent with assessed needs. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Feb 9, 2026
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and interventions were implemented to prevent accidents for one Resident (#83), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure an elopement/wandering care plan and interventions for a resident assessed at high risk for elopement (score 14, 11/18/25) was maintained and implemented, failed to include the Resident in the elopement photo/binder alert system, and failed to prevent unsupervised exit through the main door, resulting in an elopement on 1/17/26. Resident #83 was not discovered missing from the facility until 5:00 P.M. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689May 9, 2024
Based on observations, interviews and records reviewed, for one of three sampled Residents (Resident #1), whose history included a traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage without loss of consciousness and unspecified intracranial injury without loss of consciousness (traumatic brain injury/TBI), after being hit by a car as a pedestrian, who had limited attention/concentration and impaired judgement/insight, had a court appointed legal guardian, resided on a secured unit, and who was assessed and care planned for the need for staff supervision while smoking and using smoking materials, the Facility failed to ensure they provided an adequate level of staff to supervise the outside smoking area, as well as monitor and supervise the facility lobby during smoking break times to prevent an… […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF656Oct 11, 2023
Based on observation, interviews and records reviewed, for one of three sampled Residents (Resident #1), who had a history of being homeless, with alcohol and substance abuse disorders, was assessed to be at risk for elopement and his/her care plan indicated he/she was to remain in the Facility unless supervised due to a history of elopement, the Facility failed to ensure staff consistently implemented and followed interventions from his/her Plans of Care related to Elopement and Smoking, for safety. On 10/01/23, Resident #1 left his/her secure second-floor unit (North 2), unsupervised and unbeknownst to staff, took the elevator down to the first floor lobby and exited the Facility through a locked front door. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Oct 11, 2023
Based on observation, interview and records reviewed, for one of three sampled Residents (Resident #1), who had a history of being homeless, with alcohol and substance abuse disorders, resided on a secured unit in the facility, who was to remain in the Facility unless supervised due to a history of elopement and had an activated Health Care Proxy, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with an adequate level of staff supervision to maintain his/her safety in an effort to prevent an elopement. On 10/01/23, Resident #1 left his/her secure second-floor unit (North 2), unsupervised and unbeknownst to staff, took the elevator down to the first floor lobby and exited the Facility through a locked front door. […]
Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 198 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 5, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Feb 9, 2026Standard17 findings · 2 harm
- Nov 17, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Feb 11, 2025Complaint4 findings
- Oct 30, 2024Standard18 findings
- May 9, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 11, 2023Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Jul 21, 2023Standard24 findings · 2 harm
Show the 14 earlier surveys
- Jul 7, 2022Infection control3 findings
- Mar 26, 2021Standard25 findings
- Sep 4, 2019Standard41 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 6, 2019Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 7, 2018Standard19 findings
- Jun 14, 2017Complaint2 findings
- May 8, 2017Standard7 findings
- Apr 5, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Apr 14, 2016Standard11 findings
- Feb 5, 2015Standard7 findings
- Nov 18, 2013—5 findings
- Jan 31, 2013—1 finding
- Aug 23, 2012—4 findings
- Sep 22, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Regalcare at Courtyard-MedfordMedford9 harm findings
- Vantage at Worcester LLCWorcester7 harm findings
- Plymouth Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterPlymouth17 harm findings
- Blueberry Hill Rehabilitation and Healthcare CTRBeverly9 harm findings
- Watertown Rehabilitation and Nursing CenterWatertown12 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction