Waters of Rushville Skilled Nursing Facility, The
Rushville, Indiana · CCN 155053
28 surveys since 2010, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 108
- Surveys
- 28
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 98
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- INFINITY HEALTHCARE CONSULTING
- County
- Rush · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1967
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 106 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Indiana.
Last survey on record
Aug 22, 2025
444 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.08 | 3.49 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.58 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 53.6% | 48.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2993.5% | E— | F26.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6862×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
- F7272×
Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Waters of Rushville Skilled Nursing Facility, The, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727Jun 27, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse (RN) on duty at the facility for 5 of 30 days reviewed for RN coverage. This had the potential to affect 43 of 43 residents that reside in the facility. Findings include: Review of the schedules provided by the Director of Nursing (DON), on 6/25/25 at 12:44 p.m., indicated the facility did not have RN coverage, 8 hours a day, on 1/7/25, 1/21/25, 1/22/25, 1/25/25, and 1/26/25. During an interview with the DON on 6/25/25 at 12:44 p.m., she indicated the facility did not have RN coverage on 1/7/25, 1/21/25, 1/22/25, 1/25/25 and 1/26/25. The DON indicated there was no resident care and/or assessments not completed due to no RN in the building on those dates. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727Mar 28, 2024
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure eight hours of consecutive RN coverage for 9 of 91 days reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 34 residents. Findings include: The PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Data Report CASPER Report 1705D FY (Fiscal Year) Quarter 1 2024 (October 1 - December 31) reviewed on 3/25/2024 at 1:45 p.m. indicated that nine days were noted without eight hours of consecutive RN coverage. An interview on 3/26/24 at 1:34 p.m. with Corporate Payroll indicated that he did not report any RN coverage for those aforementioned nine days due to no RN being on the skilled nursing facility. An interview with Regional Nurse Consultant on 3/27/2024 at 1:20 p.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF655Aug 10, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a pain control care plan for 1 of 3 new admission reviewed. (Resident F) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 8/10/2026 at 1:02 PM. The medical diagnoses included, but were not limited to, depression and displaced comminuted fracture of the left tibia with routine healing.No baseline care plans including, but were not limited to pain, were indicated for Resident F.Physician's orders, dated 8/7/2026, indicated Resident F to use oxycodone every 8 hours as needed for pain. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Aug 10, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer vancomycin, as ordered, and to complete daily skilled nursing charting, including vital signs, for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Residents 43 and D)Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 43 was reviewed on 8/4/26 at 11:54 a.m. Resident 43's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, C.Diff (Clostridioides difficile- a bacterium that causes severe colon inflammation and watery diarrhea. It typically happens after taking antibiotics, which kill helpful gut bacteria and let C.Diff overgrow. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF686Aug 10, 2026
Based upon interview and record review, the facility failed to completely and accurately document the assessment of a pressure area and initiate treatment of a pressure area for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure areas. (Resident D) Findings include:The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 8/7/2026 at 11:05 AM. The medical diagnoses included, but were not limited to, falls and age-related debility. The admission MDS for Resident D, dated 4/27/2026, indicated that Resident 57 was cognitively intact and did not refuse care.A skin care plan, dated and initiated 4/27/2026, indicated Resident D was at risk for skin impairments. […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 108 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 10, 2026Complaint3 findings
- Aug 22, 2025Complaint4 findings
- Jun 27, 2025Standard and complaint8 findings
- Feb 21, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Mar 28, 2024Standard9 findings
- Mar 19, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Oct 31, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Feb 1, 2023Complaint4 findings
Show the 20 earlier surveys
- Dec 16, 2022Standard2 findings
- Dec 31, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Sep 26, 2019Standard5 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 11, 2018Standard6 findings
- Sep 18, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 28, 2017Standard2 findings
- Jun 8, 2016Standard and complaint6 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 23, 2015Standard3 findings
- May 1, 2014Complaint4 findings
- Mar 12, 2014Complaint5 findings
- Jan 23, 2014Standard and complaint5 findings
- Dec 17, 2013Complaint9 findings
- Nov 7, 2013—2 findings
- Apr 30, 2013—1 finding
- Dec 17, 2012—3 findings
- Jan 20, 2012—1 finding
- Dec 15, 2011Complaint7 findings
- Oct 17, 2011—6 findings
- Nov 30, 2010—1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 25, 2010—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction