Deficiency Index

Warsaw Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

Warsaw, North Carolina · CCN 345252

23 surveys since 2011, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
85
Surveys
23
Harm or worse
9
Immediate jeopardy
5
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy5

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. 1 of these were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file17/23

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
100
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
YAD HEALTHCARE
County
Duplin · rural
Medicare-certified since
1986

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
2
Staffing
1
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 125 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in North Carolina.

Last survey on record

Jun 22, 2026

140 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.223.47
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.40—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$43,924 across 4 penalties
Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ28.3%K—L—
Actual harmG14.2%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1770.8%E416.7%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 24 of the 85 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6412×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F5651×

    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.

  • F5781×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F5821×

    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Warsaw Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Dec 9, 2024

    Based on record review, and resident, Physician, Surgical Technician, and staff interviews, the facility failed to leave Resident #4 in place to be assessed by a medical professional following a fall in the facility ' s transportation van. Resident #4 was transported to a medical appointment in the facility transport van and when Transporter #1 arrived at the appointment site and parked, Resident #4 stated he was sliding from his wheelchair. Transporter #1 was not trained for transferring residents and went to back of van and transferred Resident #4 from the floor of the van back into his wheelchair. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Dec 9, 2024

    Based on observation, record review, and resident, staff and physician interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #4 was safely secured in the transportation van. During transport on 11/15/24 Resident #4 reported to the driver, Transporter #1, he felt like he was sliding out of his wheelchair. Transporter #1 had arrived at the resident's doctor's office and came to a complete stop at the front entrance to the appointment location at the time the resident reported this to him. Transporter #1 got into the back of the van and removed the seatbelt securement system. Resident #4 continued to slide down from wheelchair and onto the floor of the van with Transporter #1's assistance. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Apr 28, 2022

    Based on record review, observation, and staff, family, and police interviews, the facility failed to prevent a severely cognitively impaired resident (Resident #2) with known wandering and exit seeking behaviors from exiting the facility unsupervised. Nurse #1 failed to look for the resident when a wanderguard (a bracelet device that alarms within several feet of doors) was found in the laundry room during the day shift on 2/23/22 which allowed Resident #2 to leave the facility through the front doors on 2/24/22 without the doors alarming and without staff's knowledge. The resident walked approximately 0.2 miles away from the facility when he was observed by a police officer during a routine patrol in the area at approximately 2:30 AM. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Mar 21, 2025

    Based on observation, record reviews, and interviews with Police Officer, staff, Resident, Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner, and Physician, the facility failed to protect a Resident's right to be free from staff to resident abuse perpetrated by Nurse Aide (NA) #3 while giving care to a resident with a history of being combative. On 03/08/2025 during morning rounds, Medication Aide #2 observed Resident #9 in his bed with scratches on the left side of his forehead, side of face, nose and left eye redness (bruising). This affected 1 of 4 Residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #9). The findings included: Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarct (stroke). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF843Apr 28, 2022

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to have a transfer agreement in place for transferring residents to the local hospital for evaluation and treatment, which had the potential to effect 63 of 63 residents who resided in the facility. The findings included: Review of the facility contracts with local entities revealed that the transfer agreement with the local hospital was not executed. During an interview on 4/28/22 at 3:30 PM, the Administrator indicated residents and family were able to choose which hospital they attended. They did not have a transfer agreement with these hospitals. She revealed she had contacted the hospital and they stated they were required to treat anyone coming in under federal law.

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 85 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 22, 2026Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Mar 21, 2025Standard and complaint7 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 9, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 9, 2024Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 22, 2024Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Mar 23, 2023Standard5 findings
  • Sep 14, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 28, 2022Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
Show the 15 earlier surveys
  • Dec 10, 2021Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Jun 24, 2019Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Oct 25, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Jun 21, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 27, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 27, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Aug 31, 2016Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
  • Jul 13, 2016Complaint3 findings
  • May 5, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 31, 2015Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Mar 5, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Feb 28, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Jan 25, 2013—2 findings
  • Mar 21, 2012—4 findings
  • Feb 19, 2011—15 findings · 2 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction