Walbridge Memorial Convalescent Wing
Meeker, Colorado · CCN 065264
12 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2021.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 85
- Surveys
- 12
- Harm or worse
- 6
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 30
- Ownership
- Government - Hospital district
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Rio Blanco · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1989
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 64 facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Colorado.
Last survey on record
Dec 11, 2025
333 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.79 | 4.45 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.50 | — |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $29,981 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G416.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1458.3% | E312.5% | F312.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F7402×
Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
- F7442×
Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
- F8032×
Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Walbridge Memorial Convalescent Wing, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF740Dec 14, 2023
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary mental health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for three (#19, #9 and #10) of four residents reviewed for mental health out of 29 sample residents. The facility failed to offer alternative mental health services when Resident #9 expressed wanting to die but refused counseling services. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility after a hip replacement and heart issues. Less than six months after she was admitted she was diagnosed with cancer. She did not have signs or symptoms of depression until she fell on [DATE] and broke her right arm. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Aug 25, 2022
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#23) of two residents reviewed for skin and pressure injuries, out of 15 sample residents, received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent and heal pressure injuries. Specifically, Resident #23 developed two facility acquired avoidable pressure ulcers on his back, one of which was unstageable. Resident #23 required assistance with staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) such as dressing but staff did not identify skin concerns on the resident's back until the resident had an unstageable pressure injury with 100% necrotic tissue. The resident was identified at risk for pressure ulcers but had limited pressure ulcer preventive measures in place. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 25, 2022
Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility provided adequate supervision and monitoring for four (#1, #14, #15 and #23) residents out of seven residents reviewed for falls and accidents out of 15 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement timely interventions and create effective approaches to prevent the recurrence of falls. The facility failed to create and implement a structured fall management program to help mitigate falls and fall recurrences. Resident #23 fell 12 times from 1/17/22 to 8/15/22. Many of the falls resulted in minor injuries. The resident sustained a fracture on 7/24/22, which was his eleventh fall. There were limited new interventions put in place after each of the falls. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF692Aug 25, 2022
Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#1) of three residents reviewed for nutrition/hydration, out of 15 sample residents, maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status to avoid unintended weight loss. The facility failed to identify and implement timely interventions to maintain the resident's weight. The facility failed to timely respond to Resident #1's significant weight loss. Resident #1 lost 15 pounds (lbs) in one week, resulting in 11.6% total weight loss between 7/10/22 and 7/17/22. The facility did not timely consult with the registered dietitian (RD) after the resident lost 15 lbs. The facility did not incorporate new interventions in response to the weight loss. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686May 27, 2021
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#17) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers out of 18 sample residents did not acquire an unstageable pressure ulcer. Resident #17, who was at risk for pressure ulcers and had no pressure ulcers as of 4/11/21, spent virtually all of his time lying in bed on his back. The facility failed to implement a turning and repositioning schedule, failed to implement a proper pressure relieving mattress to keep weight off the resident's heels, failed to acquire a timely wound nurse consultation, failed to revise the care plan to reflect actual skin breakdown, and failed to consistently document weekly wound assessments. […]
Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 85 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Dec 11, 2025Standard9 findings
- Dec 14, 2023Standard9 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 25, 2022Standard6 findings · 3 harm
- May 27, 2021Standard4 findings · 2 harm
- Jul 11, 2019Standard1 finding
- May 3, 2018Standard6 findings
- Mar 16, 2017Standard6 findings
- Feb 17, 2016Standard14 findings
Show the 4 earlier surveys
- Jan 8, 2015Standard7 findings
- May 15, 2013—9 findings
- Jun 13, 2012—5 findings
- Mar 9, 2011—9 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction