Village Care and Rehabilitation Center, The
Westminster, Colorado · CCN 065367
18 surveys since 2010, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 92
- Surveys
- 18
- Harm or worse
- 7
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 60
- Ownership
- Non profit - Church related
- Chain
- COVENANT LIVING
- County
- Jefferson
- Medicare-certified since
- 1998
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=18, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Dec 19, 2024
690 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.12 | 4.45 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.74 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 43.7% | 42.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G16.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D853.3% | E640.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5801×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6381×
Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
- F6771×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Village Care and Rehabilitation Center, The, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF678Feb 28, 2023
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) prior to the arrival of fire department paramedics, contrary to the medical order set signed by one (#1) out of three residents reviewed for CPR. This failure created a situation for serious harm if not immediately corrected. Record review revealed on [DATE], Resident #1 had expressed and signed, along with his practitioner, a medical order set on a MOST form (medical orders for scope and treatment) to ensure his orders for life-sustaining treatment would be honored by health care professionals. The form read the resident wanted to receive CPR and full treatment - the primary goal to prolong life by all medically effective means. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Oct 8, 2024
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#1) of three residents reviewed for falls (#1) out of four sample residents received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent falls with injury. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation therapy after undergoing surgical repair for a fractured right femur. The facility was aware upon the resident's admission for skilled nursing services that she had several falls in her prior living setting which resulted in the need for surgical repair after the resident fell and fractured her right femur. The facility also was aware that the resident needed to maintain non-weight-bearing status of her fractured leg. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 28, 2023
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remained as free from accidents hazards as possible for two (#3 and #4) of four residents reviewed for falls out of five sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Provide effective monitoring and supervision for safety of Resident #3 and Resident #4. -Provide/install anti-roll backs on Resident #3's wheelchair to prevent rolling. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 had sufficient supervision with her risk of falling and leaning in her wheelchair. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF607Feb 28, 2023
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to thoroughly screen staff to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property, prior to a staff member providing direct care to residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Complete employee background checks before the facility allowed staff to work with residents in the facility, which included registered nurse (RN) #4; -Investigate concerns about registered nurse (RN) #4's background check; -Prevent RN #4, who had a suspended nursing license in another state, from providing direct patient care in the facility. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF843Feb 28, 2023
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to have in effect a written transfer agreement with one or more hospitals approved for participation under Medicare and Medicaid programs in order to reasonably ensure residents would be transferred from the facility to a hospital, and assured of timely admission to the hospital when transfer was medically appropriate. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a written agreement was in effect for the one local area hospital. Findings include: I. Record review During the survey from 2/21/23 to 2/28/23, the hospital transfer agreement was requested from the nursing home administrator (NHA) via email on 2/23/23 at 4:47 p.m. -The facility was unable to provide a written agreement for the one area hospital. II. […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 92 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Dec 19, 2024Standard3 findings
- Oct 8, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 21, 2023Standard and complaint6 findings
- Feb 28, 2023Complaint8 findings · 2 harm
- Sep 8, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Aug 13, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jun 17, 2020Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- May 14, 2020Infection control1 finding
Show the 10 earlier surveys
- Aug 29, 2019Standard5 findings
- Jul 11, 2018Standard1 finding
- Dec 28, 2017Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 15, 2016Standard4 findings
- Oct 29, 2015Standard6 findings
- Nov 25, 2014Standard7 findings
- Jan 7, 2014—20 findings
- Jan 30, 2013—2 findings
- Nov 10, 2011—6 findings
- Jun 10, 2010—15 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction