Vivo Healthcare Orange Park
Orange Park, Florida · CCN 105692
22 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 75
- Surveys
- 22
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 120
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- VIVO HEALTHCARE
- County
- Clay
- Medicare-certified since
- 1990
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 293 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Florida.
Last survey on record
Nov 21, 2024
718 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.33 | 3.57 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.34 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 53.5% | 44.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G15.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1578.9% | E15.3% | F210.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6952×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
- F5581×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
- F6561×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6581×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6761×
Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Vivo Healthcare Orange Park, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF686May 27, 2021
Based on observations, resident/staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident with a pressure ulcer, received necessary care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and prevent worsening of the pressure ulcer for one (Resident #75) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcer development, from a total of 35 residents in the sample. The facility failed to reposition the resident to reduce the pressure on her coccyx/sacral area, and failed to provide the resident with a pressure-reducing mattress when the wound was discovered on 05/12/2021. This contributed to worsening of the pressure area from a Stage II to an unstageable wound. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF804Jan 6, 2023
Based on observations, staff interview, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared by methods that conserved nutritive value, flavor, and appearance. The facility failed to ensure food was served at a safe and appetizing temperature. Failure to provide palatable, attractive, and appetizing food in accordance with professional standards for food service, can decrease the amount of food all residents eat and drink. Residents at nutritional and hydration risk could be impacted as well as those recovering from illness or injury. The findings include: On 1/4/2023 at 11:11 am, a follow-up visit of the kitchen was conducted with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) L. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 6, 2023
Based on the kitchen food service observations, staff interviews, facility document review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness with the potential to affect all the residents who consumed foods in the facility. The facility failed to ensure that the dietary staff was trained and knowledgeable about the proper procedures for food storage and proper sanitation practices in the kitchen. Specific instruction on food handling and sanitation is important in health care settings serving nursing home residents. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF908Jan 6, 2023
Based on kitchen food service observations, staff interviews, facility document review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen freezer in a safe operating condition with the potential to place the health of all the residents who consumed foods in the facility at risk. The facility failed to ensure that the dietary staff was trained and knowledgeable about the proper procedures for maintaining essential equipment in the kitchen. Specific instruction on kitchen equipment is important in health care settings serving nursing home residents. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF758May 27, 2021
Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to monitor targeted behaviors for residents who were receiving [CONDITION(S)] medications, and/or failed to monitor for drug-related side effects for four (Residents #25, #72, #330 and #381) of five residents reviewed for the use of [CONDITION(S)] medications, from a total of 35 residents in the sample. The findings include: 1. A review of Resident #25's medical record revealed an admitted [DATE]. Her primary medical diagnosis was [CONDITION(S)]. Her cognition was intact, and she required total assistance from staff with activities of daily living (ADLs). […]
Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 75 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Nov 21, 2024Standard1 finding
- Jan 6, 2023Standard and complaint9 findings
- Feb 24, 2022Complaint2 findings
- May 27, 2021Standard10 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 22, 2021Complaint3 findings
- Jan 20, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Nov 24, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Mar 5, 2020Complaint2 findings
Show the 14 earlier surveys
- Jul 25, 2019Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- May 31, 2019Standard8 findings · 2 harm
- Aug 15, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Mar 1, 2018Standard5 findings
- Oct 31, 2017Complaint4 findings
- Jan 12, 2017Standard6 findings
- Dec 10, 2015Standard4 findings
- Jun 3, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Sep 25, 2014Standard5 findings
- Aug 15, 2013—1 finding
- Jun 3, 2013—1 finding
- Jun 14, 2012—1 finding
- Apr 21, 2011—4 findings
- Sep 30, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction