Deficiency Index

Village of the Falls

Olmsted Falls, Ohio · CCN 366476

2 surveys since 2021, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
6
Surveys
2
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2021–2023
’21’23
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file1/2

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
36
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
SPRENGER HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS
County
Cuyahoga
Medicare-certified since
2020

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=6, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jul 20, 2023

1,208 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.793.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.74—
Annual nurse turnover63.4%46.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD375.0%E—F125.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 4 of the 6 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Village of the Falls, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 20, 2023

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure foods were stored in a clean and sanitary manner to prevent contamination and food borne illness. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 31. Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour with Dining Services Manager (DSM) #531 on 07/18/23 between 8:32 A.M. and 8:47 A.M. the following observations were made and verified at the time of discovery. In the walk-in freezer the following was observed: A plastic bag of egg omelets was open, exposed to the air, and not dated. A plastic bag of sausage patties was open, exposed to the air, and not dated and showed noticeable freezer burn. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578Jul 20, 2023

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #23 had an accurate and consistent advance directive in place throughout the medical record. This affected one (Resident #23) of eight residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 31. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included severe protein-calorie malnutrition, weakness, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06 which indicated severely impaired cognition. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Jul 20, 2023

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code Resident #23's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment. This affected one (Resident #23) of eight residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility census was 31. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included severe protein-calorie malnutrition, weakness, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the physician's orders revealed Resident #23 was admitted to hospice care on 05/16/23 with a diagnosis of end stage protein calorie malnutrition with life expectancy of six months or less if disease runs its normal course. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF849Jul 20, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure effective and ongoing communication with Resident #23's hospice company. This affected one (Resident #23) of two residents reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 31. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included severe protein-calorie malnutrition, weakness, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06 which indicated severely impaired cognition. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF582Dec 6, 2021

    Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNFABN), the facility failed to ensure Resident 23's wishes were honored for skilled services and payment for such services. This affected one (Resident #23) of four (Resident's #8, #13, #22 and #23) residents reviewed for skilled services. The facility census was 21. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #23 revealed an admitted [DATE] and a discharge date of [DATE]. diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of the nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 transferred with supervision. […]

Read all 6 findings in full →

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 20, 2023Standard4 findings
  • Dec 6, 2021Complaint2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction