Deficiency Index

Veteran Village

Florence, South Carolina · CCN 425419

1 survey since 2024, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
6
Surveys
1
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2024–2024
’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse2

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Citations on record6

Across 1 surveys carrying at least one finding.

The facility

Certified beds
52
Ownership
Government - State
Chain
Independent
County
Florence
Medicare-certified since
2023

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=6, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Oct 11, 2024

759 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.615.61
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.66—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$25,375 across 6 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG233.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD466.7%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 6 of the 6 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Veteran Village, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Oct 11, 2024

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to prevent the significant worsening of a pressure area and the development of a Stage III (3) pressure area for one (1) Resident (R21) out of 19 sampled residents, who developed in house pressure areas. R21's mattress malfunctioned which led to the increase in size in one (1) pressure ulcer and the development of another. Finding include: Review of the facility policy titled, Wound Intervention and Prevention, dated ,d+[DATE], documented, The following is meant to be a guideline and is intended to assist in the decision-making process when determining appropriate treatment and prevention according to the underlying etiology of the alteration in skin integrity, the condition of the wound, and the overall condition… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF773Oct 11, 2024

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the Medical Provider of urinalysis results ordered on 06/25/24 and 07/2/24, resulting in subsequent hospitalization of a Resident (R)12 with a Urinary Tract Infection. This deficient practice affected one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters from a total of 19 residents sampled. Findings include: Review of R12's medical record revealed an initial admitted [DATE]. R12's primary medical diagnosis was Incomplete Paraplegia. His/her secondary medical diagnoses included Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF610Oct 11, 2024

    Based on interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, facility staff failed to implement the corrective actions as indicated in the facility's investigative report for an allegation of abuse. This deficient practice affected one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for abuse from a total of 19 sampled residents. (Resident (R)48). Findings include: Cross Reference to F607 - Develop/Implement Abuse/Neglect Policies Review of the undated facility policy titled Abuse Investigation documented, An immediate investigation is warranted when abuse is suspected or reported, and a thorough investigative result will be documented. Step 11 of the policy directed staff to analyze the occurrence and implement changes to prevent further occurrences. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Oct 11, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for two (2) of 19 sampled residents by failing to: 1) Assess the placement of a gastrostomy (g-tube) tube prior to the administration of medications for one (1) of 19 sampled residents (Resident (R)36) and 2) Develop and implement interventions for episodes of hypoglycemia for residents with Diabetes for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications from a total of 19 sampled residents. (R2) Findings include: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF693Oct 11, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the appropriate treatment and services to prevent potential complications of enteral feeding for one (1) of one (1) sampled resident. Resident (R)36 received medications through a gastrostomy tube (g-tube), however, the g-tube was not aspirated for residual contents, or verified by auscultation for the proper placement prior to administration of the medications. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, dated 6/2024, and titled, Gastrostomy Tube Medication Administration, stated, Purpose: To provide medications via gastrostomy tube. Procedure: . 2. Prepare ordered medications . b. Crush pills and mix with 10-30cc [centimeters] water in one (1) medication cup . 4. […]

Read all 6 findings in full →

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Oct 11, 2024Standard and complaint6 findings · 2 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction