Vancrest of Payne
Payne, Ohio · CCN 366468
6 surveys since 2019, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 10
- Surveys
- 6
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 40
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- VANCREST HEALTH CARE CENTERS
- County
- Paulding · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2018
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=7, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Dec 23, 2025
321 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.81 | 3.57 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.55 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 32.1% | 46.9% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D675.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B112.5% | C112.5% |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Vancrest of Payne, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Dec 23, 2025
Based on observation, resident family interview, staff interviews, review of facility self-reported incidents (SRIs), and review of facility policy, the facility failed to report an allegation of injury of unknown origin. This affected one (#35) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 37. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #35 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 11/07/25. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease with early onset, age related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture, anxiety disorder, circadian rhythm sleep disorder, and dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere moderate with anxiety.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/07/25, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF686Dec 23, 2025
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure newly identified skin impairments were thoroughly evaluated and assessed. This affected one (#24) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 37.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #24 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 11/22/25. Diagnoses included urinary tract infection, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, primary osteoarthritis, hypotension, type two diabetes mellitus without complications. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF760Oct 31, 2024
Based on medical record review, staff interview, physician interview, and review of medication information from Medscape, the facility failed to administer seizure medications for a resident who was admitted to the facility from the hospital with a new onset of seizure disorder resulting in significant medication errors. This affected one (Resident #30) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 29. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #30 revealed an admitted [DATE], a transfer to the hospital on 09/25/24 and then discharged home on 09/25/2024, with a return to the facility on [DATE] after retruning to the hosptial on 09/29/2024. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF677Jan 19, 2023
Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident received timely personal hygiene care. This affected one resident (#11) out of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility identified all 24 residents required assistance from staff with bathing and dressing. The facility census was 24. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admitted [DATE]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF625Aug 23, 2022
Based on medical record review, review of the facility policy for bed-hold, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident or resident representative receive the bed-hold policy upon discharge from the facility. This affected one (Resident #34) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 32. Findings included: Review of medical record for Resident #34 revealed admitted [DATE]. The resident was admitted with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Dec 23, 2025Standard3 findings
- Oct 31, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jan 19, 2023Standard2 findings
- Aug 23, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Dec 7, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Aug 22, 2019Standard2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction