Deficiency Index

Astoria Health & Rehab Center

Germantown, Ohio · CCN 366291

9 surveys since 2011, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
34
Surveys
9
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file8/9

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
50
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP
County
Montgomery
Medicare-certified since
2004

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
1
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=2, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Apr 16, 2026

207 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.173.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.48—
Annual nurse turnover44.4%46.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD—E—F1100.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 1 of the 34 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Astoria Health & Rehab Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF584Apr 16, 2026

    Based on record review, observation, review of facility policy, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure bed linens were applied to the beds of residents using an air mattress. This affected three (#27, #13, and #11) out of ten residents reviewed for linen use on beds. This also affected six residents (#2, #60, #33, #36, #15, and #40) identified by the facility to be using an air mattress on the bed and cognitively impaired. Additionally, the facility failed to have an adequate number of clean towels and washcloths on hand for resident care. This had the potential to affect all residents. The total census was 45.Findings include-1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF580Aug 19, 2026

    Based on record review, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to notify the physician when medications were not administered. The affected one resident, (Resident #41) of three reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 40. Findings Include:Review of Resident #41's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/05/26 and a discharge date of 04/01/26. Resident was admitted with diagnoses of rhabdomyolysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, post-traumatic stress disorder, parkinsonism, anxiety disorder, essential (primary) hypertension, pain in unspecified shoulder, low back pain, fibromyalgia, and chest pain.Review of the 5- Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident 41 had moderate cognitive impairment. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 34 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 19, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 16, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 29, 2018Standard5 findings
  • Apr 7, 2016Standard2 findings
  • Sep 23, 2013—13 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 4, 2013—1 finding
  • Aug 25, 2012—2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 7, 2012—1 finding
Show the 1 earlier survey
  • Mar 10, 2011—8 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction