Valley View Healthcare & Rehab
Houston, Minnesota · CCN 245566
14 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2025.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 75
- Surveys
- 14
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 40
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Houston
- Medicare-certified since
- 1991
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 123 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Minnesota.
Last survey on record
Jan 29, 2025
649 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.20 | 4.22 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.95 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 19.1% | 42.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $26,685 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J110.0% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D440.0% | E110.0% | F440.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F5611×
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
- F6921×
Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
- F6951×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
- F8011×
Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Valley View Healthcare & Rehab, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Jan 29, 2025
Based on interview and document review the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment, monitor, and notify the physician for a sudden change in mental and physical status for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who had a change in condition. The deficiency was identified as past non-compliance and issued at Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on [DATE], when R1 demonstrated changes to mental status, speech, and mobility in which licensed nursing staff failed to comprehensively assess, monitor, and notify the physician. The Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of the IJ on [DATE] at 5:30 p.m. The facility had implemented immediate corrective action on [DATE] to prevent recurrence, the IJ was issued at past non complinace. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF919Jan 29, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a complete wireless call light system in which staff were provided with functioning devices in their possession. This had the potential to affect all 33 residents at the facility. Findings include: During a phone interview on 1/29/25 at 9:26 a.m., registered nurse (RN)-A stated the facility's call light system was the worst she had ever seen. The call lights could not be heard and could not tell if they were going off unless she was in the hallway looking at the thin display bar that identified which call lights were going off. During an interview on 1/29/25 at 11:31 a.m., nursing assistant (NA)-E stated the call lights show up on the scroll board that showed the room number and bed 'A' or 'B'. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801May 10, 2023
Based on interview, and document review, the facility failed to employ either a full time registered dietitian (RD) or a qualified dietary manager (DM) to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service since December 2022. This failure had the potential to affect all 31 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 05/08/23 at 9:45 a.m., the DM stated she recently completed the Serv Safe course but was not a certified dietary manager (CDM). The DM stated the facility's registered dietitian (RD) was employed on a consultant basis and usually visited the facility once per week. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 10, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to label, date, and cover food stored in kitchen refrigerator and freezer storage. The facility also failed to discard hot dogs that had signs of spoilage and left-over food stored in refrigeration for greater than seven days. This had the potential to affect 30 residents who consumed food prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings include: 1. Observation during the initial kitchen inspection on 05/08/23 from 9:45 a.m. to 10:15 a.m., with the dietary manager (DM) present, revealed the following: a. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF921May 10, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to keep the kitchen's small mixer, sheet pans, two kitchen drawers, and a shelf where food preparation equipment was stored clean. The facility also failed to maintain the kitchen's walk-in freezer in safe operating condition by failing to prevent ice buildup inside the freezer. This failure had the potential to affect 30 residents who consumed food prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings include: 1. Observation during the initial inspection of the facility's kitchen on 05/08/23 from 9:45 a.m. to 10:15 a.m., with the dietary manager (DM) present, revealed the following: a. The kitchen's small mixer, covered and ready for use, was unclean with dried food splatters. b. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 75 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 29, 2025Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 13, 2024Standard2 findings
- May 10, 2023Standard and complaint5 findings
- Apr 26, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jul 9, 2021Standard7 findings
- Apr 13, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Sep 5, 2019Standard9 findings
- Aug 29, 2018Standard9 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
- Aug 11, 2016Standard4 findings
- Jun 5, 2015Standard14 findings
- Jul 17, 2014Standard7 findings
- Aug 15, 2013—2 findings
- Sep 20, 2012—5 findings
- Jul 28, 2011—5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction