United Hebrew Geriatric Center
New Rochelle, New York · CCN 335621
12 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 32
- Surveys
- 12
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 294
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Westchester
- Medicare-certified since
- 1977
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=13, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Apr 23, 2026
200 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.06 | 3.67 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.96 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 18.3% | 37.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1191.7% | E18.3% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at United Hebrew Geriatric Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF600Apr 23, 2026
Based on record reviews, interviews, and observations conducted during an abbreviated (2968858) survey, the facility did not ensure that a resident was free from abuse. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents sampled for abuse. Specifically, Certified Nursing Assistant #1 is seen in video footage dated 03/26/2026 hitting the back of Resident #1's head.The facility policy #276 for abuse prevention last reviewed January 2025 documented that it was their policy to ensure all residents were free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. Resident #1 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Apr 23, 2026
Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (2968858), the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and law enforcement) in accordance with State law through established procedures. This was evident in one out of three residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #1). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Apr 23, 2026
Based on record review, and interviews during an abbreviated survey (2968858), the facility did not ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented to maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment and was involved in a documented incident on 03/26/2026 where abuse occurred and an abuse care plan was not initiated. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF582Dec 9, 2025
Based on record review and interview the facility did not ensure a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage is given by the facility to all Medicare beneficiaries at least two days before the termination of services for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #194) reviewed for Beneficiary Notification. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that Resident #194 and/or their representative received and signed a two (2) day Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage before termination of services. The findings include: Resident #194 was admitted with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, atherosclerotic heart disease and unspecified atrial fibrillation. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF761Dec 9, 2025
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure that drugs and biologicals were maintained in accordance with current professional standards for storage, labeling and expiration dates during review of medication storage on two (2) of four (4) units. Specifically, 1) observation of the fourth-floor medication cart revealed one (1) insulin pen with no open date and one (1) insulin pen with no patient label and no open date. The fifth-floor medication cart revealed two (2) insulin pens which had not been discarded within 28 days after opening as per the manufacture's recommendation, and 2) a physician ordered Trelegy Ellipta (inhaler) was left in Resident #155's room on the bedside table. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 32 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 23, 2026Complaint3 findings
- Dec 9, 2025Standard2 findings
- Oct 6, 2023Standard4 findings
- Dec 23, 2022Complaint4 findings
- Jun 13, 2019Standard2 findings
- Apr 17, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Oct 24, 2017Standard1 finding
- Aug 22, 2017Complaint4 findings · 3 harm
Show the 4 earlier surveys
- Aug 23, 2016Standard1 finding
- Jul 24, 2015Standard1 finding
- Jun 26, 2012—2 findings
- Jul 29, 2011—7 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction