UNC Rockingham Rehab & Nursing Care Center
Eden, North Carolina · CCN 345249
12 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 41
- Surveys
- 12
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 121
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Rockingham
- Medicare-certified since
- 1986
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=10, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jun 19, 2025
508 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.58 | 4.62 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.17 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 31.4% | 41.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D228.6% | E457.1% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B114.3% | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at UNC Rockingham Rehab & Nursing Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 6, 2026
Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in a sanitary manner and failed to have functioning water temperature gauges for the dish machine. The facility failed to label food stored for use and failed to discard expired food in 1 of 3 reach-in refrigerators (Refrigerator #1 used to store milk) and 3 of 3 nourishment refrigerators (East hall, [NAME] hall, and South hall nourishment refrigerators). The facility also failed to maintain hot food above 135 degrees Fahrenheit ( F) on the tray line. The facility used a low temperature dishwasher to wash and rinse dishes; The dishwasher used chlorine based chemical sanitation. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Aug 6, 2026
Based on observations, staff interviews and manufacturer recommendations, the facility failed to date opened multi-dose vials of insulin medications, and failed to remove expired medications from the medication cart drawers for 4 of 4 medication administration carts reviewed (cart number 2 on South Hall, carts number 1 and 2 on [NAME] Hall, and cart number 2 on East Hall).Findings Included: A review of the manufacturer's recommendations, dated December 1st, 2023, indicated to discard Lantus insulin multi-dose vial 28 days after opening. a. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF565Jun 19, 2025
Based on record review, and interviews of staff, residents, and the hospital Food Service Director, the facility failed to act promptly to resolve grievances reported about the resident's food preferences, missing food items, and meats that were hard to cut and chew since the March 2025 Resident Council Meeting for five residents that regularly attended. This deficient practice affected 5 of 11 residents present during the Resident Council Meetings of 3/26/25, 4/30/25, and 5/28/25 (Residents #16, #18, #20, #40, and #57). Findings included: The Resident Council Concern Form was completed on 2/10/25 by the Administrator that Resident #40 was receiving food that she could not eat, and meats were tough to cut. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF803Jun 19, 2025
Based on a lunch meal tray line observation, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow the approved menu when 5 of 5 residents on a moist and minced diet only received 2 ounces of fish instead of 4 ounces as per the menu. In addition, the facility served 2 ounces of mashed potatoes instead of 4 ounces per the menu to 54 of 61 residents who ate a regular or mechanically altered diet. The findings included: 1. The daily diet menu for 6/19/25 revealed residents on a moist and minced diet (a mechanically altered diet where all foods were soft, moist, and finely minced or mashed into very small pieces) should have received 4 ounces of fish. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF804Jun 19, 2025
Based on record review, observations, and resident and staff interviews and a test tray, the facility failed to provide food that was appetizing in texture and palatability for 5 of 5 residents (Residents #16, #18, #20, #40, and #57) reviewed for food palatability and preferences. The findings included: In a Resident Council meeting on 6/18/25 at 12:04 PM, Residents #16, #18, #20, #40, and #57 reported the food was bland, they did not receive seasoning packets on their trays everyday, and they said the meat served was too tough to cut or chew. On 06/19/2025 beginning at 11:25 AM, all foods on the steam table were checked for safe temperatures by the Dietary Manager, and a test tray was followed from the serving line with the Dietary Manager to the serving cart on the 200- hall. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 41 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 6, 2026Standard2 findings
- Jun 19, 2025Standard4 findings
- May 22, 2024Standard1 finding
- Mar 23, 2023Standard2 findings
- May 21, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Sep 27, 2018Standard6 findings
- Aug 24, 2017Standard3 findings
- Oct 8, 2015Standard2 findings
Show the 4 earlier surveys
- Apr 16, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Aug 9, 2013—6 findings
- May 17, 2012—1 finding
- Apr 28, 2011—12 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction