Tyler's Retreat at Iron Bridge
Chester, Virginia · CCN 495401
16 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 120
- Surveys
- 16
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 90
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP
- County
- Chesterfield
- Medicare-certified since
- 2010
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 39 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Virginia.
Last survey on record
Aug 13, 2025
453 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.85 | 3.42 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.77 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 50.0% | 47.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3884.4% | E613.3% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C12.2% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6564×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6953×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
- F5802×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6222×
Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
- F6232×
Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Tyler's Retreat at Iron Bridge, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF700Aug 13, 2025
Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement bed rail requirements for four of 36 residents in the survey sample, Residents #6, #100, #101, and #102. The findings include: 1. For Resident #6 (R6), the facility staff failed to assess the resident for risk of entrapment and failed to attempt appropriate alternatives prior to the resident's use of bed rails (grab bars).On 8/11/25 at 12:44 p.m., R6 was observed lying in bed with bilateral grab bars in the upright position.A review of R6's clinical record (including an enabler-restraint observation form dated 7/3/25) failed to reveal documentation that the facility staff assessed the resident for risk of entrapment or attempted appropriate alternatives.On… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF623Jan 19, 2023
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide written notice of a hospital transfer to the Resident Representative and/or State Long Term Care Ombudsman office for four of 30 residents in the survey sample; Residents #1, #8, #35, and #72. The findings include: 1. For Resident #1, the facility staff failed to evidence a written notification of a hospital transfer was provided to the resident representative and to the State Long Term Care Ombudsman office for a hospital transfer on 10/19/22; and failed to evidence a written notification of a hospital transfer was provided to the resident representative for a hospital transfer on 12/8/22. A. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Jan 19, 2023
Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, clinical record review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined the facility staff failed to develop and/or implement a comprehensive care plan for five of 30 residents in the survey sample, Residents #123, #23, #1, #21 and #68. The findings include: 1. For R123, the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for the administration of medications per the physician order. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a Medicare five-day assessment, with an assessment reference date of 9/8/2022, the resident scored a 7 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was severely impaired for making daily decisions. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Aug 5, 2021
Based on observation, resident interviews, staff interviews, clinical record reviews and facility document reviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop and/or implement the comprehensive care plan for eight of 37 residents in the survey sample, (Residents #58, #6, #17, #48, #67, #28, #53 and #29). The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to implement Resident #58's comprehensive pain care plan for the use of non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of as needed pain medication. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Aug 5, 2021
Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for four of 37 residents in the survey sample, Residents #31, #25, #37 and #21. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to review and revise Resident #31's comprehensive care plan for the use of bed rails. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #31's diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 120 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 13, 2025Standard and complaint4 findings
- Jun 12, 2024Complaint6 findings
- Oct 17, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Jan 19, 2023Standard17 findings
- Aug 5, 2021Standard16 findings
- May 16, 2019Standard9 findings
- May 4, 2018Standard14 findings
- Mar 2, 2017Standard9 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
- Mar 24, 2016Standard5 findings
- Feb 12, 2015Standard5 findings
- Feb 6, 2014Standard11 findings
- Jan 31, 2013—5 findings
- Jun 12, 2012—1 finding
- Jan 20, 2012—10 findings
- Oct 26, 2011—5 findings
- Feb 25, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Jamestown Health and RehabilitationWilliamsburg1 harm finding
- South Roanoke Nursing and RehabilitationRoanokeno harm findings
- Westmoreland Rehabilitation & Healthcare CenterColonial Beach1 harm finding
- Dockside Health & Rehab CenterLocust Hill3 harm findings
- Berea Health & Rehab CenterFredericksburg3 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction