Deficiency Index

Twin Oaks Convalescent Center

Alma, Georgia · CCN 115513

7 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
12
Surveys
7
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file6/7

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
88
Ownership
Non profit - Other
Chain
Independent
County
Bacon · rural
Medicare-certified since
1991

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=2, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Mar 28, 2025

591 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.893.50
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.66—
Annual nurse turnover45.0%41.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 2 of the 12 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Twin Oaks Convalescent Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Mar 28, 2025

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBPs) for one resident (R) (R219) with bilateral diabetic ulcers and weeping lower leg skin tears out of four sampled residents. This failure had the potential to place R219 at risk of increased transmission of infection. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 7/3/2024, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug resistant organisms .prompt recognition of need .All staff receive training on enhanced barrier precautions upon hire and at least… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF921Mar 28, 2025

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Safe and Homelike Environment, the facility failed to ensure one resident (R)(R59) out of 22 sampled residents' room had an adequate working air conditioner for a comfortable temperature for the resident. This failure had the potential to cause R59 to not be comfortable in her own room. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Safe and Homelike Environment, original date of 10/22 revealed Twin Oaks Convalescent Center will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment . […]

Read all 12 findings in full →

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 28, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Sep 20, 2018Standard1 finding
  • Oct 26, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Jan 5, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Apr 2, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Apr 5, 2012—3 findings
  • Jul 9, 2010—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction