Deficiency Index

Meadows Park Health and Rehabilitation

Vidalia, Georgia · CCN 115726

2 surveys since 2022, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
4
Surveys
2
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2022–2025
’22’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Citations on record4

Across 2 surveys carrying at least one finding.

The facility

Certified beds
75
Ownership
Non profit - Other
Chain
ETHICA HEALTH
County
Toombs · rural
Medicare-certified since
2015

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

May 22, 2025

536 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.923.50
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.63—
Annual nurse turnover27.6%41.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD375.0%E—F125.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 4 of the 4 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Meadows Park Health and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 22, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Storage Areas, the facility failed to ensure shakes were dated for two of two nourishment rooms (First and Second Floor). The deficient practice had the potential for the spread of food borne illness to affect 69 out of 72 residents that received an oral diet. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage Areas, dated [DATE] under Guideline revealed, Items should be covered, sealed, labeled, and dated appropriately. During an inspection on [DATE] at 10:39 am with the Dietary Manager (DM) in the nourishment room on the first floor, the refrigerator contained five four-ounce cartons of [Name of shakes]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880May 22, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policies titled Standard Precaution/Use of PPE [personal protective equipment], and Transmission-Based Precautions (Contact, Enhanced Barrier Precautions [EBP], Droplet, Airborne), the facility failed to maintain infection control measures for one of 24 sampled residents (R) (R4). Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that enhanced barrier precautions were maintained during enteral feeding/medication administration for R4. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF690Apr 10, 2022

    Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy titled Foley Catheter Care, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure catheter care was provided in a manner to prevent urinary tract infections for one resident (R) (R#52) of six residents with indwelling urinary catheters. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Foley Catheter Care dated 2020 revealed: Intent - to promote hygiene, comfort and decrease risk of infection for patients with an indwelling catheter and is performed daily and PRN (as needed). Please see Lippincott Nursing Practice Manuel for additional information on how to complete the procedure. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF758Apr 10, 2022

    Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy titled [CONDITION(S)] Medications, and staff interview, the facility failed to document the intended duration of therapy for one resident (R) (#116) that had an order for PRN antianxiety medications beyond 14 days of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled [CONDITION(S)] Medications dated 2019 revealed Guideline: PRN (as needed) Orders for [CONDITION(S)] drugs are limited to 14 days. If the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, he or she should document their rationale in the patient's medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN order. […]

Read all 4 findings in full →

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 22, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Apr 10, 2022Standard2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction