Deficiency Index

Tuscola County Medical Care Facility

Caro, Michigan · CCN 235089

18 surveys since 2010, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
79
Surveys
18
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse7

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file15/18

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
159
Ownership
Government - County
Chain
Independent
County
Tuscola · rural
Medicare-certified since
1967

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
3
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 18 government-run facilities with 128 or more beds in Michigan.

Last survey on record

Dec 12, 2025

332 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.955.07
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.00—
Annual nurse turnover24.5%44.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG14.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD834.8%E1043.5%F313.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C14.3%
CMS’s current file: 23 of the 79 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6862×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

  • F6902×

    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.

  • F6932×

    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.

  • F6952×

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Tuscola County Medical Care Facility, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Oct 27, 2023

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent development and worsening of pressure ulcers for two residents (Resident #24, Resident #37), resulting in the worsening of a skin injury for Resident #24 and a facility-acquired Stage III pressure ulcer for Resident #37. Findings include: Record review of facility 'Skin Care' policy dated 11/8/2022 revealed a head-to-toe skin assessment is completed and documented on all residents upon admission by a licensed nurse and/or registered nurse, and weekly skin assessment thereafter by licensed or registered nurse that is documented in EMR. Skin Risk assessment to be completed on admission, weekly for 4 weeks then quarterly with MDS schedule and as needed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 12, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area, resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings Include:On 12/9/25 at 10:15 AM, an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with Dietary Manager (DM) C. The following observations were made: -A drain from the walk-in freezer drained into a hole in the floor. The tube was lower than the floor. -A drain that the DM reported she thought it was for the ice machine, was observed going into a cut out from the floor drain area and did not have an air gap. The drainpipe was below the level of the floor. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF921Dec 12, 2025

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate backflow prevention was installed at plumbing fixtures, resulting in the potential for contamination of the water supply, affecting all residents. Findings include: On 12/11/2025 at approximately 12:41pm-1:24pm during the environmental tour with the Life Safety Officer B, observed a hose attached to a spigot without a backflow preventer at the cold water line located in the boiler room. On 12/11/2025 at approximately 12:41pm-1:24pm observed the water softener drain line sitting directly inside a drain. On 12/11/2025 at approximately 12:41pm-1:24pm observed a utility sink with a chemical feed downstream of an atmospheric vacuum breaker located in the housekeeping closets in Rooms 278, 206, 136, and 178. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Oct 17, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to ensure analyzed observational data of personal cares with a continued spread of a Multi-Drug Resistant Organism (MDRO), 2) Failed to ensure proper Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) use, 3) Failed to ensure proper hand hygiene, 4) Failed to ensure proper wound care, 5) Failed to ensure proper perineal (peri) care for two residents (Resident #40, Resident $45) of two residents reviewed for peri-care and 6) Failed to prevent a wound infection for one resident (Resident #45) of three residents reviewed for wound care, resulting in the continued in-house spread of Proteus Mirabilis infections, staff not following enhanced barrier precautions and providing clean cares with the likelihood of the further spread of… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Dec 12, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents' rights were being met by 1) Ensuring that call lights were within reach or easily accessible to residents and/or 2) Ensuring that call lights were responded to in a timely manner for four residents (R11, R74, R78 and R121) of four residents sampled for accommodation of needs and also a Confidential Group of Residents. Findings include:Resident #11 (R11): On 12/11/25 at 12:32 PM, an observation was made of Resident 11 sitting up in his wheelchair, propelling himself in his room. An observation was made of the Resident's call light positioned on the floor underneath the bed. The call light hung from the wall and the bed was positioned up against the wall. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 79 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 12, 2025Standard7 findings
  • Oct 17, 2024Standard11 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 27, 2023Standard7 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 19, 2021Standard6 findings
  • Jul 11, 2019Standard12 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 11, 2018Standard7 findings
  • Apr 21, 2017Standard6 findings
  • May 4, 2016Standard and complaint6 findings · 1 harm
Show the 10 earlier surveys
  • Feb 12, 2015Standard and complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 30, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 27, 2014Standard2 findings
  • May 2, 2013—1 finding
  • Feb 15, 2013—1 finding
  • Feb 10, 2012—2 findings
  • Dec 21, 2011—1 finding
  • Jun 29, 2011—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 4, 2011—4 findings
  • Dec 14, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction