Deficiency Index

Turlock Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Turlock, California · CCN 555240

28 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
112
Surveys
28
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file18/28

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
144
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
THE ENSIGN GROUP
County
Stanislaus
Medicare-certified since
1986

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 225 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in California.

Last survey on record

Jun 17, 2026

145 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.894.08
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.62—
Annual nurse turnover34.9%37.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3071.4%E716.7%F511.9%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 42 of the 112 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6583×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5542×

    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.

  • F5802×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Turlock Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Aug 23, 2021

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when licensed nurses did not notify the physician, did not conduct assessment or monitoring after Resident 1 experienced a hypoglycemic (low blood sugar) event on 10/29/20 at 12:54 p.m., requiring emergency treatment with IV (intravenous- in the vein) medication. Resident 1 remained in the facility after emergency IV treatment and licensed nurses did not conduct change of condition assessments and did not follow facility policy and procedure to monitor the hypoglycemic event resulting in Resident 1 experiencing a second hypoglycemic episode on 10/29/20 at 6:00 p.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF802Mar 6, 2026

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure Maintenance Director (MAIND) and Dietary [NAME] (DC) were trained to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services safely and effectively for 136 of 136 residents when:1. MAIND did not sanitize ice bin during cleaning process according to the manufacturer's guidelines.2. DC did not demonstrate correct thermometer calibration during meal preparation.These failures had the potential to place all 136 residents receiving food from the kitchen at risk for cross-contamination (process by which bacteria is transferred from one object or substance to another, with harmful effect) and exposure of foodborne illnesses (a condition where a person becomes sick after consuming contaminated food or beverages. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 6, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices were followed for 136 of 136 residents when:1. A bin containing six bags of stew meat was not labeled with pull-out (a date when items were taken out from the freezer to thaw out in the refrigerator) and use-by date.2. Black and brownish substances were found inside the ice machine.These failures had the potential risk of cross contamination (process by which bacteria is transferred from one object or substance to another, with harmful effect) and exposure of microorganisms (a microscopic organism, especially a bacterium, virus, or fungus) that harbor foodborne pathogens (a bacterium, virus, or other microorganism that can cause disease) from improperly… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Mar 6, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and transmission of infections for 11 of 23 sampled residents (Resident 143, Resident 46, Resident 53, Resident 154, Resident 39, Resident 109, Resident 70, Resident 20, Resident 149, Resident 5 and Resident 111) when:1. Resident 143 had a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC line- a long, thin, flexible tube inserted into a large vein in the upper arm, with its tip near the heart) dressing that was not changed for nine days, was not labeled accurately during a dressing change, and the insertion site was not visible under the transparent dressing after a dressing change. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF803May 21, 2024

    Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the menu approved by the Registered Dietitian (RD) was followed for 131 of 131 residents when the meatloaf portion served to residents was less than 4 ounces (oz-unit of measurements). This failure had the potential for residents to receive the wrong caloric intake and not meet the nutritional needs of the residents which could compromise their medical status. Findings: During a review of the Detailed Census Report, (census), dated 5/21/24, the census indicated there were 134 residents in the facility. During an observation on 5/21/24, at 11:40 AM, in the facility kitchen, [NAME] 1 was cutting a cooked meatloaf into slices for lunch. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 112 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 17, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 6, 2026Standard16 findings
  • Jun 18, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 20, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 12, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 5, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 15, 2024Standard8 findings
  • May 21, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 20 earlier surveys
  • Mar 26, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 20, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 27, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 20, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 28, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 27, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 23, 2021Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 19, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 27, 2019Standard8 findings
  • Aug 19, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 14, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 13, 2018Standard13 findings
  • May 19, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Mar 3, 2016Standard11 findings
  • Feb 18, 2015Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Jan 22, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 21, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Feb 14, 2013—2 findings
  • Feb 3, 2012—10 findings
  • Dec 2, 2010—5 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction