Villa las Palmas Healthcare Center
El Cajon, California · CCN 055806
47 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 148
- Surveys
- 47
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 151
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- PACS GROUP
- County
- San Diego
- Medicare-certified since
- 1967
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 225 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in California.
Last survey on record
Apr 14, 2026
209 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.73 | 4.08 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.48 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 33.1% | 37.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $33,732 across 2 penalties
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G24.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3880.9% | E612.8% | F12.1% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5504×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6843×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F5842×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6002×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Villa las Palmas Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF600May 5, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 1) was free from verbal and mental abuse when: Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 yelled at Resident 1 and made disparaging comments to the resident about their ability to perform bed mobility while also making humiliating comments to the resident regarding their weight and size. Cross reference F607. As a result: Resident 1 cried, experienced depressed mood, psychosocial (the influence of social factors on an individual's mind or behavior) distress, and felt unsafe in the facility and worthless. Findings: A review of Residents 1 ' s Admission Record dated 5/1/25, indicated the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF692Mar 4, 2024
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address the nutrition and hydration need of one of three residents (Resident 1) when: Resident 1's nutrition and hydration need, as recommended by the registered dietician (RD), was not implemented. The interdisciplinary team (IDT - team of individual with different specialties) did not address Resident 1's weight loss. As a result, Resident 1 was found lethargic (lack of mental and physical energy) and hard to arouse (wake up). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 8, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food items stored in the residents' refrigerator were labeled and dated and discarded within two days per the facility policy. This deficient practice had the potential to affect who stored items in the residents' refrigerator. Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Bringing In Food For Our Residents, revealed, Food or beverages should be labeled and dated to monitor for food safety. The policy revealed, Food or beverage items without a manufacturer's expiration date should be dated upon arrival in the facility and thrown away two days after the date marked. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF850Apr 17, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a qualified Social Services Director (SSD) on a full- time basis that met the qualifications specified in the regulation. This deficient practice placed all 151 residents at risk of not receiving medically-related social services necessary to attain their highest practicable well-being. Findings: An anonymous complaint regarding the SSD not meeting job qualifications was received by the California Department of Public Health. On 4/17/25, an unannounced site visit was conducted. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 4/17/25 at 2:10 P.M. The DON stated there had been some staff turnover in the SW department. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Oct 18, 2023
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control standards of practice when: 1. A dedicated blood pressure cuff, stethoscope and thermometer were not available for eight residents who were on contact isolation precautions for a multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO-bacteria that developed resistance to one or more classes of antibiotics). 2. Face shields or eye protection were not available for staff to use upon entering a resident room with a diagnosis of Coronavirus (COVID-19 an infectious respiratory infection). These failures had the potential to expose other residents, staff, and visitors to infection. Findings: 1. An interview was conducted with the Infection Preventionist (IP) on 9/29/23, at 10:07 A.M. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 148 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 14, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Dec 19, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jul 29, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jun 12, 2025Complaint1 finding
- May 8, 2025Standard3 findings
- May 5, 2025Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 17, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Mar 4, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 39 earlier surveys
- Dec 26, 2023Complaint4 findings
- Oct 18, 2023Complaint3 findings
- Jul 14, 2023Complaint1 finding
- May 9, 2023Complaint1 finding
- May 4, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Apr 6, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Dec 22, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Oct 14, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Aug 31, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Aug 1, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Jul 28, 2022Standard17 findings
- Feb 12, 2021Infection control3 findings
- Sep 23, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Nov 1, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Apr 23, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Mar 22, 2019Standard and complaint21 findings
- Dec 5, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Mar 26, 2018Standard6 findings
- Mar 1, 2018Complaint3 findings
- Dec 14, 2017Complaint1 finding
- May 19, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Dec 15, 2016Standard11 findings
- Jan 6, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Nov 16, 2015Standard9 findings
- Oct 17, 2014Standard12 findings
- Dec 6, 2013—8 findings
- Nov 26, 2013—1 finding
- Sep 30, 2013—2 findings
- Sep 12, 2013—1 finding
- Mar 7, 2013—1 finding
- Dec 24, 2012—1 finding
- Dec 19, 2012—1 finding
- Oct 26, 2012—3 findings
- Sep 19, 2012—1 finding
- Sep 10, 2012—2 findings
- May 31, 2012—1 finding
- Apr 18, 2012—1 finding
- Mar 23, 2012—1 finding
- Oct 20, 2011—7 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction