Deficiency Index

Tulsa Nursing Center

Tulsa, Oklahoma · CCN 375389

28 surveys since 2011, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
106
Surveys
28
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file23/28

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
104
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
STONEGATE SENIOR LIVING
County
Tulsa
Medicare-certified since
2000

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 94 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Oklahoma.

Last survey on record

Apr 30, 2026

193 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.173.68
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.24—
Annual nurse turnover51.3%54.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1680.0%E420.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 20 of the 106 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F5801×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F6251×

    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.

  • F6371×

    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition

  • F6401×

    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Tulsa Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Mar 12, 2025

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were reviewed and revised after each assessment for 2 (#5 and #18) of 21 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The administrator identified 96 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #5 had diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The care plan showed the last review was completed on 09/11/24. Review of the clinical record showed a quarterly assessment had been completed on 01/21/25. On 03/12/25 at 2:05 p.m., corporate MDS coordinator #1 stated Resident #5's care plan was currently being reviewed and revised. They stated the last review was completed on 09/11/24. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF756Mar 12, 2025

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure monthly medication reviews were completed for 4 (#2, 16, 66, and #69)of 5 sampled residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The administrator and corporate nurse consultant identified 96 residents who received medications. Findings: 1. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included depression. A Medication Monitoring Medication Regimen Review and Reporting policy, dated January 2024, read in part, The consultant pharmacist reviews the medication regimen and medical chart of each resident at least monthly to appropriately monitor the medication regimen and ensure that the medications each resident receives are clinically indicated.The findings are communicated to the director of nursing or designee and the medical… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF698Oct 31, 2022

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pre and post [CONDITION(S)] assessments were completed for one (#24) of one residents who were reviewed for [CONDITION(S)]. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form identified five residents who received [CONDITION(S)]. Findings: A [CONDITION(S)]-Hemodialysis policy, dated 02/12/20, read in parts, .Pre [CONDITION(S)]: Section A to be completed by the sending community licensed nurse and to accompany patient to the [CONDITION(S)] center .Post [CONDITION(S)]: Community nurse to assess and complete Section C . Resident #24 had diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of the current physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF700Oct 31, 2022

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to review alternatives to bed rails with the resident and/or resident representative and failed to maintain the bedrails in safe condition for one (#19) of one resident evaluated for bed rails. The corporate nurse consultant identified 18 residents who utilize bed rails. Findings: An Enablers including Bed Rails policy, revised 09/14/18, read in parts, .The nursing staff will use enablers, whenever possible, in lieu of restraints, to assist the resident to obtain, maintain and enhance their functional status, and improve their quality of life .Residents will be assessed for the need or desire to have bed rails upon admission, readmission, quarterly and with significant change of condition .Assess the resident for the… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Aug 3, 2022

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure wound care was performed as ordered by the physician for one (#3) of one sampled resident who was reviewed for non-pressure ulcer realted wound care. The DON identified four residents who had non pressure ulcer wounds. Findings: Resident #3 had diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . An admission MDS assessment, dated 05/21/22, documented the resident's cognition was intact and required supervision with bed mobility, and transfers. A physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . A TAR, dated 07/13/22 through 07/30/22, documented the wound care to the right front calf had not been completed on 07/16/22 and 07/17/22. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 106 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 30, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 12, 2025Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Oct 17, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 16, 2023Standard3 findings
  • Oct 31, 2022Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Aug 3, 2022Complaint5 findings
  • Dec 21, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 21, 2021Complaint1 finding
Show the 20 earlier surveys
  • Aug 30, 2021Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Jun 23, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Dec 16, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Sep 16, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 6, 2019Standard and complaint11 findings
  • May 29, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 19, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Feb 11, 2018Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 14, 2017Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Aug 22, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 15, 2016Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 19, 2016Standard11 findings
  • Nov 21, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Jun 10, 2014Complaint3 findings
  • Sep 19, 2013—4 findings
  • Jun 27, 2013Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 19, 2012—4 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 17, 2011—1 finding
  • Jun 10, 2011—5 findings
  • Mar 8, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction