Truman Senior Living
Truman, Minnesota · CCN 245346
18 surveys since 2011, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 125
- Surveys
- 18
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 30
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Martin · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1986
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 123 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Minnesota.
Last survey on record
Jul 24, 2026
108 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.77 | 4.22 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.90 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 45.5% | 42.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1292.3% | E17.7% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F5721×
Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
- F5761×
Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
- F5801×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Truman Senior Living, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 30, 2022
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment in the kitchen and failed to ensure dishwashing sanitization was appropriately monitored. This had the potential to affect all 25 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: On 12/27/22, at 1:06 p.m., the following was observed in the kitchen: (ceiling tiles were 2 feet by 4 feet). 1) A pipe that ran the length of the rear of the kitchen above 2 food prep counters and hand washing station identified as clean by C-A was covered with dirt, dust and debris. 2) Three ceiling tiles in the same area over the mixer and clean food prep area at the rear of the kitchen had 3 tiles missing. 3) Two tiles over clean uncovered water glasses, cups, and tin food storage bins was missing. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Dec 30, 2022
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was implemented to prevent the spread of Covid-19 per guidance by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) when testing residents for Covid-19. During an observation, staff failed to wear eye protection and to change gloves and perform hand hygiene for 4 of 4 residents (R8, R4, R18, R12) tested for Covid-19, potentially affecting all 25 residents. Further, the facility failed to have a water management program consistent with nationally accepted standards (e.g., ASHRAE [American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers] or CDC). This had the potential to effect all 25 resident who resided in the facility. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF576Feb 27, 2024
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident mail was delivered on Saturdays for 1 of 1 residents (R8) who voiced concerns with mail delivery. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 22 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 2/27/24 at 12:41 p.m., with R8 who was the resident council president, and who according to a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], was cognitively intact. The interview took place in R8's room due to the facility being in Covid-19 outbreak status. R8 stated mail was delivered to the facility on Saturdays, described as a small stack of mail wrapped up, and the nursing staff locked it away until Monday when the activities director delivered it. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Jul 24, 2026
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an alleged violation involving neglect were reported to the State Agency within the required timeframe after becoming aware that staff failed to follow a resident's transfer care plan by transferring the resident without the required gait belt for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for falls. Findings include:R1's face sheet dated 6/24/26, identified diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive brain disorder that damages memory), chronic kidney disease (a long-term condition where the kidneys are damaged), osteoporosis (a medical condition where the bones become thin and weak), and diabetes (a condition where your body uses glucose as fuel). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Jul 24, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure use of the correct sling was used according to manufacture instructions for a total body mechanical lift 1 of 1 resident (R2) reviewed for safe transfers involving mechanical lifts. In addition the facility failed to complete a comprehensive fall investigation analysis to identify root cause/causal factors to prevent and/or reduce the risk of falls and/or falls with major injury for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for falls. Findings include R2's face sheet dated 7/24/26, identified diagnoses of dementia, heart failure, spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spaces within the spine). […]
Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 125 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 24, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Jan 2, 2026Standard3 findings
- Nov 14, 2024Standard1 finding
- Aug 21, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Mar 19, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Feb 27, 2024Standard3 findings
- Dec 30, 2022Standard10 findings
- Jul 28, 2021Standard3 findings
Show the 10 earlier surveys
- Jun 14, 2019Standard11 findings
- Aug 23, 2018Standard18 findings · 2 harm
- Jul 20, 2017Standard13 findings
- Apr 28, 2016Standard7 findings
- Jul 1, 2015Standard8 findings
- May 29, 2014Standard6 findings
- Apr 25, 2013—5 findings
- Sep 26, 2012—1 finding
- Aug 17, 2012Standard22 findings · 3 harm
- Sep 15, 2011—8 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction