Deficiency Index

Torrington Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC

Torrington, Connecticut · CCN 075105

30 surveys since 2011, 10 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
197
Surveys
30
Harm or worse
10
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file24/30

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
75
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
ESSENTIAL HEALTHCARE
County
Nw Hills · rural
Medicare-certified since
1971

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
5
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 27 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Connecticut.

Last survey on record

May 11, 2026

182 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.513.64
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.15—
Annual nurse turnover21.1%40.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG12.4%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2458.5%E819.5%F12.4%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B512.2%C24.9%
CMS’s current file: 41 of the 197 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F5782×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F5852×

    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.

  • F6002×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6402×

    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Torrington Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF657Aug 28, 2024

    Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy and interviews for nine sampled residents (#26, #27, #32, #43, #50, #61, #64, #69, and #376) reviewed for care planning, the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team (IDT) resident care plan meetings were held following comprehensive and quarterly assessments and failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed by the IDT team with resident/family/responsible party involvement. The findings include: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF578May 11, 2026

    Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #28) reviewed for Advanced Directives, the facility failed to implement advanced directives according to the resident's expressed wishes. The findings include:Resident #28 had diagnoses that included dementia, hyperlipidemia, and edema. The physician's orders signed monthly from 3/19/24 through 5/5/26 directed a Full Code (despite Resident #28's wishes from 4/7/25 to be a DNR).The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #28 had moderately cognitively impaired, was independent for transfers, toileting, and required partial moderate assistance for bathing. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF565Aug 28, 2024

    Based on review of the resident council meeting minutes, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to respond to concerns identified by the resident council regarding the need to speak with a Social Worker in the facility. The findings include: Review of the Resident Council meeting minutes dated 4/26/24, 5/31/24, 6/28/24, and 7/26/24 identified the expressed wish to speak with the Social Worker and although, there were designated resident council department response forms that were utilized to answer resident council requests, concerns and grievances, there were no resolutions identified to the residents' expressed aspirations and no indication that the social worker had attended any of the meetings to address the requests from the… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Aug 28, 2024

    1. Based on observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a homelike, safe, and sanitary environment for two shower rooms on the central and middle unit and for the identified carpeted areas on the central unit. The findings include: Observation of the shower room area on 8/21/24 at 10:16 AM identified two of three shower rooms in the central shower area to have several items stored to include two rolling shower chairs stacked two high, six IV poles, a lounging shower chair, a utility cart, a cardboard box, and a black substance on the ceiling and a shower curtain with holes in it. The third shower room contained two rolling shower chairs. Observation on 8/21/24 at 10:25 AM of the south wing hallway identified several dark brown stains of unknown substance on the carpet. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF745Aug 28, 2024

    Based on clinical record reviews and interviews for five sample residents (Resident #26, #35, #69, and #376) who required psychosocial support, the facility failed to ensure a Social Worker was available to meet resident needs. The findings include: 1. Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pericardial effusion, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, orthostatic hypotension, atrial fibrillation, and implantable cardiac defibrillator. The RCP dated 7/4/24 identified Resident #26 was at risk for alteration in psychosocial well-being. […]

Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 197 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 11, 2026Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Feb 27, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 28, 2024Standard17 findings
  • Mar 11, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 24, 2022Standard4 findings
  • Aug 26, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 20, 2021Complaint5 findings
  • Mar 1, 2021Complaint1 finding
Show the 22 earlier surveys
  • Oct 7, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 16, 2020Infection control5 findings
  • Aug 3, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jul 1, 2020Infection control3 findings · 1 harm
  • May 13, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Mar 12, 2020Complaint6 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 28, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 30, 2019Complaint5 findings
  • Sep 19, 2019Standard15 findings · 1 harm
  • May 14, 2019Complaint4 findings
  • Jul 20, 2018Standard and complaint8 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 5, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 3, 2017Standard and complaint32 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 12, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 8, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 16, 2016Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Dec 8, 2015Standard and complaint18 findings · 2 harm
  • Jan 26, 2015Standard14 findings
  • Mar 17, 2014Standard9 findings
  • Apr 12, 2013—7 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 5, 2012—5 findings
  • Jan 25, 2011—13 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction