Tomahawk Health Services
Tomahawk, Wisconsin · CCN 525334
22 surveys since 2011, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 123
- Surveys
- 22
- Harm or worse
- 9
- Immediate jeopardy
- 6
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 50
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE
- County
- Lincoln · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1983
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 92 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Wisconsin.
Last survey on record
Apr 1, 2026
222 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.52 | 3.73 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.01 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 40.0% | 45.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $15,940 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J14.0% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1768.0% | E416.0% | F312.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5611×
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
- F5711×
Limit the charges against residents' personal funds for items or services for which payment is made under Medicare or Medicaid.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Tomahawk Health Services, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Apr 1, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent elopement or falls for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (R23, R5).R23 has a history of elopement attempts on and was assessed to be at risk for wandering and elopement. R23 wears a Wanderguard that alerts staff to her attempts to elope. On 02/24/26, R23 exited the facility without staff knowledge and without the Wanderguard alarm sounding. R23 was found by a citizen approximately 0.7 miles from the facility with approximately 1 inch of snow on top of her head. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Nov 3, 2022
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not provide preventative care for pressure injuries for 3 of 3 residents (R) reviewed for actual and potential pressure injuries (R196, R17, and R23.) R196 was admitted with pressure injuries. Interventions of the air mattress and wheelchair cushion were not put in place to promote healing and prevent pressure injuries from developing. R196 developed 2 new open areas within 13 days of admission to the facility. The open areas have defined borders and slough that meet the definition of a stage III pressure injury. R17 is at risk for the development of pressure injuries. Surveyor observed R17 up in her wheelchair from 6:30 am until 10:45 am when she was laid down for incontinence care. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 1, 2026
Based on observation and interviews, the facility did not ensure the safety of food handling in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect all 48 residents that eat orally. Prepared food placed in the walk-in cooler had been covered but was not labeled or dated, food in dry storage was not covered or dated, and 2 opened containers of milk were in milk cooler without indication of when they were open or when they should be used by resulting in the potential for foodborne illnesses to spread.Findings include:The facility's guidelines titled, Labeling and Dating dated 2017, states in part, All foods should be dated upon receipt before being stored. Food labels must include: the food item name. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Apr 1, 2026
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for all 44 residents in the facility.The facility failed to protect residents from risk of transmission of communicable disease as follows: No airborne precaution signs posted on residents diagnosed with COVID Certified nursing assistant (CNA) staff not using proper N95 masks when entering rooms of positive COVID residents PPE carts stocked with one size N95 masks for all staff to use, despite FIT testing recommendations. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF803Jan 15, 2025
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not follow the menu and did not notify residents of the menu change. This had the potential to affect all 43 residents in the facility. -The facility served a different meal than what was noted on the menu. The facility did notify residents of the menu change. -This resulted in residents complaining of the menu change. -This resulted in one resident (R28) requesting a bowl of cereal for lunch as he did not want what was posted on the menu. R28 was not notified of the menu change and was not given the option to receive the meal that was served. Findings: The facility's policy titled Menus, read in part, Menus will be planned in advance. […]
Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 123 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 1, 2026Standard and complaint11 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 15, 2025Standard5 findings
- Nov 22, 2023Standard9 findings
- Jun 12, 2023Complaint2 findings
- May 3, 2023Infection control1 finding
- Nov 3, 2022Standard and complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 9, 2021Standard2 findings
- Jul 17, 2019Complaint10 findings · 2 harm
Show the 14 earlier surveys
- Nov 28, 2018Standard4 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 5, 2017Standard2 findings
- Sep 28, 2016Standard1 finding
- Dec 16, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Sep 10, 2015Standard3 findings
- May 12, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Mar 25, 2015Standard and complaint8 findings
- Jan 28, 2015Standard and complaint17 findings
- Jun 25, 2014Standard and complaint22 findings · 4 harm
- Oct 30, 2013—2 findings
- Sep 19, 2013—7 findings
- Mar 20, 2013—3 findings
- Jun 21, 2011—1 finding
- Mar 29, 2011—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction