Deficiency Index

The Villas at the Park

Saint Louis Park, Minnesota · CCN 245083

26 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
182
Surveys
26
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file23/26

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
52
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT
County
Hennepin
Medicare-certified since
1979

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 55 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Minnesota.

Last survey on record

Nov 20, 2025

354 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.163.62
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.67—
Annual nurse turnover36.6%50.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$126,238 across 9 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG26.9%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2379.3%E310.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C13.4%
CMS’s current file: 29 of the 182 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5542×

    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6882×

    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Villas at the Park, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF688Nov 20, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a resident received appropriate interventions to prevent contractures for a resident who was admitted to the care facility without contractures (permanent shortening of tissue, such as muscle, tendon or skin leading to the inability to straighten joints fully and to permanent deformity and disability) for one of two residents (R20) reviewed for range of motion. This resulted in actual harm when R20 developed severe contractures of bilateral upper and lower extremities. Findings include:R20s significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R20 was admitted to the care facility on 3/20/19. The MDS indicated R20 was not on any range of motion or restorative nursing programs. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Oct 24, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and implement pressure ulcer interventions for 2 of 2 residents (R30, R33) identified at risk for pressure ulcers. This resulted in actual harm when R30 developed two deep tissue injuries which worsened to unstageable pressure injuries on the heels after admission, and R33 developed a stage two pressure ulcer after admission that worsened to an unstageable pressure ulcer. Additionally, the facility failed to reposition 1 of 2 residents (R30) in accordance with the current care plan, and failed to accurately stage a pressure ulcer and failed to accurately assess nutritional needs and implement provider ordered nutritional interventions to aide in healing for 1 of 2 residents (R33) reviewed… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 26, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to maintain appropriate temperature in a refrigerator used for cold food storage to prevent potential food borne illness for all residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings included: On 1/23/23, at 11:56 a.m. a kitchen tour was conducted with registered dietitian (RD) and cook (C) -A. The following was observed during the kitchen tour: Upright coolers: 80 oz (ounce) partial container of low-fat cottage cheese. Expiration date 1/16/23. 80 oz partial container of low-fat sour cream. Open date 1/8/23. Observed 4 orange-colored spots of discoloration inside the container. During an interview on 1/23/23 at 12:09 p.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jun 29, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) including eye protection and source control masks to prevent and/or minimize the spread of COVID-19. This had the potential to affect all 44 residents who resided at the facility. Findings include: On 6/28/21, at 11:15 a.m. upon facility entrance the front desk receptionist (R)-A was observed to be wearing a mask under her chin and was not wearing eye protection. An unidentified activities assistant was also noted to be sitting in the activities area/living room with no eye protection on. Two unidentified residents were noted to be in the activities area/living room and were listening to a woman singing. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF583Nov 20, 2025

    During observation and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions to ensure resident's personal care information was kept secured and out of public view when stored on 1 of 3 mobile medication carts. This had the potential to affect 14 residents (R3, R4, R9, R14, R27, R28, R30, R32, R35, R40, R43, R47, R48, and a discharged resident) on the long-term care unit whose personal information was left unattended on a medication cart in the hallway corridor. Findings include:During observation and interview on 11/19/25 at 9:05 a.m., an unattended medication cart had a form titled East nursing care sheet with 13 resident names, room numbers, and notations including other personal information such as nutritional needs such as tube feeding, blood sugars, blood pressures, heart rates,… […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 182 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Nov 20, 2025Standard8 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 24, 2024Standard8 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 9, 2023Standard and complaint13 findings
  • May 5, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 26, 2023Standard12 findings
  • Aug 24, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 11, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 12, 2022Complaint1 finding
Show the 18 earlier surveys
  • Oct 14, 2021Standard2 findings
  • Aug 23, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 10, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 29, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 12, 2019Standard9 findings
  • Feb 7, 2019Complaint5 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 4, 2018Standard36 findings
  • Sep 4, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 12, 2018Standard4 findings
  • Jul 26, 2017Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 6, 2017Standard13 findings
  • Jun 1, 2016Standard22 findings · 2 harm
  • Jan 6, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • May 14, 2015Standard10 findings
  • Feb 13, 2014—4 findings
  • Dec 20, 2012—1 finding
  • Nov 9, 2011—5 findings
  • Jan 13, 2011—16 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction