Meadow Manor
Grand Meadow, Minnesota · CCN 245367
23 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 137
- Surveys
- 23
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 26
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- ACCURA HEALTHCARE
- County
- Mower · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1986
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 55 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Minnesota.
Last survey on record
Feb 18, 2026
264 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 2.94 | 3.62 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.66 | — |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G15.0% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1575.0% | E15.0% | F210.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C15.0% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5541×
Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
- F5671×
Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
- F5771×
Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Meadow Manor, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 22, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to compressively assess falls for root cause, implement appropriate interventions and follow the care plan to prevent and/or reduce the risk of falls with major injury for 2 of 2 residents (R3 and R2) with history of falls. This resulted in actual harm for R3 when he sustained a hand fracture and lacerations to his face and foot and R2 when she sustained a laceration above the eye that required sutures as a result of a fall. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF851Feb 18, 2026
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to submit completed and accurate direct care staffing information for 1 of 1 quarters reviewed (Quarter 4), July 1-September 30 2025, to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) according to specifications established by CMS. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 18 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the Payroll Based Journal Report (PBJ) [NAME] Report 1705 D for quarter 4 identified excessively low weekend staffing, one star staffing rating, no RN hours for 11 days in quarter 4 and failed to have licensed nursing coverage 24 Hours/Day for 65 days in quarter 4. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF867Aug 22, 2024
Based on interview and document review the facility failed to develop, implement, monitor, and evaluate falls quality improvement project (QIP) that was an identified problem-prone area to improve performance and ensure sustainability. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings include SEE F689: Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to compressively assess falls for root cause, implement appropriate interventions and follow the care plan to prevent and/or reduce the risk of falls with major injury for 2 of 2 residents (R3 and R2) with history of falls. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 15, 2022
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to properly label, date opened food items and monitor for expired items which continued to be used. This practice had the potential to affect all 20 of the residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey and any staff and visitors who may consume the kitchen prepared food items. Finding include: During the initial kitchen tour on [DATE], at 12:18 p.m. Cook (C) confirmed observations. -The standup freezer located in the kitchen was found to have a bag of frozen fajita blended vegetables opened on [DATE] in the original clear plastic bag with a twist tie holding it closed, an Imperial blend of vegetables opened and not dated, donuts were in a bag not dated. There were numerous others unknown items observed and not dated. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF888Jul 15, 2022
Based on observation, interview and document review, facility failed to fully implement an immunization tracking and surveillance plan that was accessible and usable by the facility clinical leadership in order to monitor and ensure facility response to the Covid-19 health concern. This had the potential to impact all 20 current residents, and staff currently working at the facility. Findings include: During an interview at the survey entrance conference on 7/11/22, 12:21 p.m. the facility administrator stated the director of nursing (DON) was responsible for infection control (IC) and infection prevention (IP) in the facility and for the Covid-19 immunization and testing response. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 137 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 18, 2026Standard1 finding
- Jan 23, 2025Standard5 findings
- Aug 22, 2024Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 22, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Nov 30, 2023Standard7 findings
- Sep 12, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Nov 1, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jul 15, 2022Standard and complaint9 findings
Show the 15 earlier surveys
- May 7, 2021Standard and complaint17 findings
- Oct 6, 2020Infection control2 findings
- Oct 8, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jul 25, 2019Standard12 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 1, 2018Standard9 findings
- Apr 27, 2017Standard5 findings
- Nov 14, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Feb 25, 2016Standard11 findings
- Apr 2, 2015Standard15 findings
- Jan 26, 2015Complaint3 findings
- Mar 6, 2014Standard9 findings
- Apr 12, 2013—5 findings
- Aug 31, 2012—5 findings
- Sep 22, 2011—4 findings
- Apr 14, 2011—7 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction