The Villas at Roseville
Roseville, Minnesota · CCN 245326
29 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 101
- Surveys
- 29
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. 1 of these were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 63
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT
- County
- Ramsey
- Medicare-certified since
- 1986
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 55 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Minnesota.
Last survey on record
Apr 30, 2026
193 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.29 | 3.62 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.85 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 41.0% | 50.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $24,791 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J210.5% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1578.9% | E— | F15.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C15.3% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6572×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5781×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
- F6041×
Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at The Villas at Roseville, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF760Mar 5, 2025
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the medications ordered by the provider for 1 out of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for significant medication errors, which resulted in hospitalization in the intensive care unit (ICU). This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R1 when the facility omitted her apixaban (medication that decreases clotting ability of blood) for six days, for a total of 12 doses, R1 had a stroke and was sent to the hospital. The facility implemented corrective action prior to the investigation so the deficiency was issued at Past Noncompliance. The IJ began on 2/18/25 at 4:00 p.m., when R1 missed her first dose of apixaban (Eliquis). […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF578Dec 14, 2023
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident specific advanced directive orders were accurately reflected throughout the medical record for 1 of 3 residents (R13) reviewed for advanced directives. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R13 who would have been denied cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) contrary to their wishes, in the absence of a pulse or respirations. The IJ began on [DATE] when R13's Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) identified R13 had an active order to administer CPR, however, the physician orders indicated R13 was do-not-resuscitate (DNR). The administrator was notified of the IJ on [DATE], at 3:15 p.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Apr 30, 2026
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to employ either a full-time registered dietician (RD) or a qualified dietary manager (DM) to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service since January of 2020, which had the potential to affect all 54 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: Qualifications for the Culinary Services Director (CSD) was requested however was not received. During the initial kitchen tour on 4/27/26 at 10:45 a.m., CSD stated she worked full time at the facility and there was also a registered dietician (RD) who worked one day a week but was available by phone for questions whenever needed. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Sep 1, 2021
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to properly secure medications in 1 of 1 treatment cart observed for medication storage. Findings include: During an observation on 8/31/21, at 8:20 a.m. the treatment cart was unlocked and unattended by staff. The cart was located outside of the medication room in the hallway across from the nurse's station and at the intersection of the three resident rooms hallways. During the observation, multiple residents walked passed as they returned to their rooms from breakfast and to go outside. At 9:30 a.m. the cart remained unlocked until registered nurse (RN)-A walked and locked the treatment cart. During observation on 9/1/21, at 8:48 a.m. the treatment cart was unlocked and unattended. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Sep 1, 2021
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance and Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Covid recommendations were followed for eye protection being used by facility staff while in resident care areas. In addition failed to ensure proper sanitizing of re-useable equipment reviewed for infection control. Findings include: Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) COVID-19 PPE Grid for Congregate Care Settings dated 6/30/21, in accordance with the CDC, indicated health care workers with face to face contact with residents. On 8/30/21, at 2:16 p.m. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 101 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 30, 2026Standard and complaint6 findings
- Nov 20, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Mar 12, 2025Standard6 findings
- Mar 5, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 26, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Mar 22, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Dec 28, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Dec 14, 2023Standard2 findings · 1 harm
Show the 21 earlier surveys
- Mar 23, 2023Standard2 findings
- Sep 1, 2021Standard7 findings
- Oct 5, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jul 23, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Mar 31, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Mar 4, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jan 22, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 26, 2019Standard6 findings
- Mar 3, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jun 7, 2018Standard4 findings
- Feb 22, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 15, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Apr 27, 2017Standard13 findings
- Jun 10, 2016Standard and complaint11 findings
- Apr 30, 2015Standard7 findings
- May 22, 2014Complaint1 finding
- May 21, 2014Standard8 findings
- Jul 11, 2013—5 findings
- May 16, 2013—1 finding
- Aug 16, 2012—3 findings
- Jun 28, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction