Deficiency Index

The Suites Pasadena

Pasadena, Texas · CCN 676332

35 surveys since 2013. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
129
Surveys
35
Harm or worse
9
Immediate jeopardy
4
The record, 2013–2026
’13’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy4

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file24/35

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
50
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
EDURO HEALTHCARE
County
Harris
Medicare-certified since
2013
Ownership changed
In the last 12 months

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
2
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 75 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

Mar 12, 2026

242 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.663.40
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.43—
Annual nurse turnover75.5%50.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$286,133 across 6 penalties
Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ24.3%K24.3%L—
Actual harmG12.2%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2043.5%E1532.6%F510.9%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C12.2%
CMS’s current file: 46 of the 129 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F5522×

    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.

  • F6442×

    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

  • F6582×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6862×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Suites Pasadena, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF686Aug 25, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents received care, consistent with professional standards of care to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for 1 of 7 (Resident #7) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. - The facility failed to prevent Resident #7 from acquiring DTIs to both of her heels and from the L heel progressing into an unstageable PU, when she was admitted with only redness to both heels. Resident #7 required hospitalization for the treatment of the injuries to her heels.An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 8/21/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 8/21/2025 at 12:55pm. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF686Sep 19, 2023

    Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 6 residents (CR #105) reviewed for treatment and services to prevent and heal pressure ulcers. 1. CR #105 was not provided wound care from [DATE] through [DATE] although the wound was identified as present prior to his admission on [DATE] . 2. CR #105 was not identified with wounds upon admission; skin assessments were not completed upon admission/re-admission. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Feb 19, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistant device to prevent elopement.for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents. Resident #1 walked out of the facility unattended and was missing for 2 hours on 2/08/24 around 8:00 PM, until hospital staff contacted the facility. This failure could affect residents with diagnose of dementia at risk of elopement thus placing themselves at risk of physical harm, pain and mental anguish or emotional distress. This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 2/16/24 at 1:00 PM. The Administrator and DON were notified. The Administrator was provided the Immediate Jeopardy Template on 2/16/24 at 1:00 PM. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Jan 29, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 5 residents (CR#1) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure LVN B properly assess CR#1 when he gave medication on [DATE] at 9:00am when CR#1 vomited, aspirated and later died . The facility failed to ensure that CR#1 was checked on every two hours and was not laying in her vomit from 7:15 am until 11:15am on [DATE]. The facility failed to ensure that CNAs report to the charge nurse when they found CR#1 in her own vomit. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE]. […]

  • Actual harm, patternF692Sep 19, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were able to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that it was not possible or the resident preferences indicated otherwise for 3 of 18 (Residents #31, #32, and #89) reviewed for nutrition and hydration status and maintenance. 1. The facility failed ensure Resident #31, Resident #32, and Resident #89 did not sustain an unplanned and/or unexpected significant weight loss. 2. […]

Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 129 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 12, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 16, 2026Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Aug 25, 2025Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 21, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 31, 2024Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Mar 29, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 12, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 19, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 27 earlier surveys
  • Jan 29, 2024Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 17, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 19, 2023Standard and complaint18 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 9, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 2, 2022Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 8, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 3, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 4, 2021Complaint3 findings
  • Feb 2, 2021Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 1, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 14, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 4, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 20, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 15, 2020Standard15 findings
  • Oct 5, 2020Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 30, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 24, 2020Complaint4 findings
  • Apr 12, 2019Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Apr 27, 2018Standard4 findings
  • Mar 30, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 8, 2018Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Jun 29, 2017Complaint4 findings
  • Feb 16, 2017Standard6 findings
  • May 19, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 20, 2015Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Feb 27, 2014Standard8 findings
  • Jul 18, 2013—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction