Avir at Luling
Luling, Texas · CCN 676292
33 surveys since 2011, 12 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 169
- Surveys
- 33
- Harm or worse
- 12
- Immediate jeopardy
- 11
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 56
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- AVIR HEALTH GROUP
- County
- Caldwell
- Medicare-certified since
- 2011
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 75 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
Feb 4, 2026
278 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 2.82 | 3.40 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.18 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 76.1% | 50.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $35,559 across 3 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J12.4% | K12.4% | L— |
| Actual harm | G12.4% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1843.9% | E1741.5% | F37.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F7274×
Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
- F8124×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F6093×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Avir at Luling, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF689May 6, 2025
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. A) The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 did not leave the facility without supervision and/or staff knowledge as Resident #1 was returned to the facility by a community member on 04/03/2025. B) The facility failed to ensure staff were educated that Resident #2 was a high elopement risk and implement interventions. C) The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's bed was in a low position with a fall mat in place when he fell on [DATE] and sustained a left hip fracture. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Oct 11, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents environment remained as free of accident hazards possible and ensure each resident received adequate supervision for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was not missing from the facility on 10/07/24 for an unknown amount of time until EMS contacted and notified them that he was approximately .9 miles away and had fallen and found on the railroad tracks. Approximately 500 feet from the facility was a busy highway with through traffic of commercial vehicles to include semi-trucks. This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 10/10/24 at 2:47 PM and an IJ template was given. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Jul 22, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were free from physical abuse for one (Resident #1) of four resident reviewed for abuse. 1. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was not physically abused by Resident #2 on 07/12/2025.2. 2. The facility failed to implement interventions to ensure Resident #1 was not physically abused by Resident #2 on 07/13/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of ongoing abuse, injury and psychosocial harmBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were free from physical abuse for one (Resident #1) of four resident reviewed for abuse. 1. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was not physically abused by Resident #2 on 07/12/2025. 2. 2. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF908Nov 21, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for safe operating condition. 1. The facility failed to ensure refrigerator #2 maintained a safe storage temperature and not allow food items to be improperly stored.2. The facility failed to ensure the inside kitchen freezer maintained a safe storage temperature and did not allow food items to thaw. These failures pose a risk to all residents of the facility who eat food from the kitchen as they are at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings included: Observation on 9/23/2025 at 7:20 AM, Refrigerator #2 silver in color, temperature revealed to be at 52 degrees. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 6, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation, in that: 1. The facility failed to store clean plastic cups in a manner that allowed for air circulation. 2. The facility failed to ensure the tabletop can opener blade and base were free of buildup of grime and debris. 3. The facility failed to ensure an opened 5-lb. bag of pancake mix was stored in a sealed bag or container in the dry storage room. 4. The facility failed to ensure the interior racks, walls and floor of the reach-in refrigerator were free of dirt and debris. 5. […]
Read 30 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 30 of 169 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 4, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jan 20, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Nov 21, 2025Standard12 findings
- Jul 22, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- May 6, 2025Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 7, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Oct 11, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 6, 2024Standard13 findings
Show the 25 earlier surveys
- Aug 11, 2023Standard6 findings
- Sep 27, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jun 24, 2022Standard6 findings
- Jun 3, 2021Complaint1 finding
- May 21, 2021Standard19 findings
- Apr 21, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jul 21, 2020Infection control3 findings · 2 harm
- May 21, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Oct 17, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Sep 11, 2019Standard and complaint12 findings
- Jul 3, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Apr 5, 2019Complaint3 findings
- Sep 27, 2018Standard13 findings
- Aug 2, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Feb 23, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Sep 29, 2017Standard10 findings
- Oct 7, 2016Standard7 findings
- Oct 1, 2015Standard and complaint11 findings
- Nov 14, 2014Standard5 findings
- May 28, 2014Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Sep 5, 2013—7 findings
- Jul 12, 2013—2 findings
- Mar 22, 2013Complaint6 findings · 5 harm
- Jul 5, 2012—10 findings
- Jul 14, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction