Deficiency Index

The Springs of Camden

Camden, Arkansas · CCN 045189

30 surveys since 2011, 10 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
145
Surveys
30
Harm or worse
10
Immediate jeopardy
10
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy10

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file27/30

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
106
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
THE SPRINGS ARKANSAS
County
Ouachita · rural
Medicare-certified since
1992

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
4
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 85 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Arkansas.

Last survey on record

May 8, 2025

550 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.963.91
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.60—
Annual nurse turnover48.8%49.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD939.1%E1043.5%F313.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B14.3%C—
CMS’s current file: 23 of the 145 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F6412×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6902×

    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.

  • F8042×

    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Springs of Camden, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 15, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that temperatures were monitored in the refrigerators and freezers to prevent cross contamination and food borne illness for residents who received meals from the facility kitchen. This failed practice had the potential to affect 70 residents who receive meals from the facility kitchen The findings are: 1. On 03/11/2024 at 09:23 AM, between the kitchen and pantry (hallway) is a chest freezer, the freezer was checked and did not have a thermometer in place. The freezer held frozen vegetables. 2. On 03/11/2024 at 09:25 AM, Dietary Employee [DE] #3 was asked about the dented cans in the pantry. DE #3 advised that they are putting the dented cans down on the bottom shelf that is marked for dented cans. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 13, 2023

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure that food was prepared under sanitary conditions; that food and equipment was stored in a manner that did not promote foodborne illness; and resident trays were free of chips and cracks. The failed practice had the potential to effect 64 residents who received their meals from one of one kitchen according to a list provided by the Administrator on 1/12/23 10:10 AM. The findings are: a. On 1/09/23 at 5:13 PM, there was a black substance that outlined the circumference of the door on the stainless-steel front of the freezer where the rubber seal closures met the back of the unit. Multiple boxes of food had water from the condenser frozen on top of them. Areas of rust were on the shelves of the freezer. b. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF908Jan 13, 2023

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure that the kitchen freezer operated in a manner that was safe and minimized the possibility of food cross contamination which could result in food borne illness. The failed practice had the potential to affect the 64 residents who obtain their meals from 1 of 1 Kitchen according to a list provided by the Administrator on 1/12/23 at 10:10 AM. The findings are: a. On 1/9/23 at 5:13 PM, a 2-door freezer had rivulets of water streaming down from the condenser that was located at the top of the unit. The Dietary Manager stated, we are getting a new company on Wednesday, so I hope they will fix that. The Surveyor asked the Dietary Manager if the Maintenance Department was aware of the problem. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Feb 2, 2022

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure measures to reduce the potential transmission of communicable disease was consistently performed and maintained as evidenced by failure to promptly notify local/state public health officials of the number of COVID-19 cases in the facility; and failure to instruct visitors on steps/practices to reduce transmission of communicable diseases in 1 of 1 facility. These failed practices had the potential to affect all 59 residents in the facility, as documented on the Daily Census Report which was provided by the Administrator on 1/31/21 at 10:35 a.m. The findings are: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF885Feb 2, 2022

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents and/or their family were notified by 5 PM the next calendar day following the occurrence of a confirmed positive COVID-19 resident or staff member to reduce potential transmission of COVID-19 in 1 of 1 facility. These failed practices had the potential to affect all 59 residents who resided in the facility, according to the Daily Census provided by the Administrator 1/31/22 at 10:35 AM. The findings are: 1. Resident #2 had diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 11/26/21 documented the resident scored 3 (0-7 indicates severe impairment) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). […]

Read 30 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 30 of 145 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 8, 2025Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Mar 15, 2024Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Jan 13, 2023Standard and complaint13 findings
  • Jul 12, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 2, 2022Complaint3 findings
  • Nov 19, 2021Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Nov 2, 2021Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 27, 2021Infection control3 findings
Show the 22 earlier surveys
  • Nov 25, 2020Infection control2 findings
  • Oct 30, 2020Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Jul 14, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Apr 8, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 28, 2020Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 16, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 31, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • May 17, 2019Standard and complaint7 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 6, 2018Complaint7 findings · 3 harm
  • Jul 27, 2018Standard17 findings
  • Oct 25, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 6, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Feb 10, 2016Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Aug 27, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 27, 2015Complaint9 findings · 3 harm
  • Jan 20, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Mar 20, 2014Standard6 findings
  • May 17, 2013—4 findings
  • May 9, 2012—1 finding
  • Apr 20, 2012—2 findings
  • Sep 9, 2011—1 finding
  • Mar 18, 2011—17 findings · 3 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction