Care Manor Nursing and Rehab
Mountain Home, Arkansas · CCN 045351
32 surveys since 2010, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 147
- Surveys
- 32
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 104
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- ANTHONY & BRYAN ADAMS
- County
- Baxter · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1999
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 85 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Arkansas.
Last survey on record
Aug 29, 2025
437 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.80 | 3.91 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.51 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 65.1% | 49.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D426.7% | E1066.7% | F16.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F5581×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
- F6251×
Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
- F6571×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Care Manor Nursing and Rehab, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Aug 29, 2025
Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on document review, interviews and policy review the facility failed to prevent abuse for one (Resident#12) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: Resident #62 A review of Resident #62’s “Quarterly Minimum Data Set” (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/05/2025, indicated that Resident #62 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) with a score of two, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. A review of Resident #62’s “Care Plan” revealed that Resident #62 has decreased physical mobility related to muscle wasting and weakness. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 10, 2023
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment; food items stored in the refrigerator /freezer were covered, sealed and dated; expired food items were promptly removed/discarded by the expiration or use by dates; foods were dated when received or opened to assure first in first out usage and hot foods on the steam table were maintained at or above 135 degrees Fahrenheit while awaiting service, to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. The failed practices had the potential to affect 44 residents who received meals from the kitchen (total census: 45), as documented on a list provided by the Dietary Supervisor on [DATE] and the findings are: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Nov 10, 2021
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure refrigerators, worktables, and an ice scoop were maintained in clean condition to minimize the potential for foodborne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. This failed practice had the potential to affect 50 residents who received meals from the kitchen and ice from the nutrition room's ice machine, based on a list provided by the Dietary Manager on 11/09/2021. The findings are: 1. On 11/07/21 at 10:27 AM, during initial rounds of the kitchen the following observations were made: a. Next to the ice machine, was a three-door silver refrigerator with orange serving trays on the floor. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF641Aug 29, 2025
Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately completed for five (Resident #7, Resident #4, Resident #69, Resident # 34, and Resident #58) of 10 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. The findings include: Resident #7 Review of Resident #7's Medical Records on 08/26/2025 at 9:16 AM indicated there was no Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) information available in the electronic medical record. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657May 16, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the comprehensive care plan was revised or updated for 1 (Resident #47) sampled resident. The findings are: Review of an Order Summary revealed Resident #47 had a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of brain. On a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/27/2024 Resident #47 received a score of 3 (0-7 indicates severely cognitive impaired) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status. The MDS documented the resident requires substantial/maximum assistance with personal hygiene. On 05/14/2024 at 12:56 PM, a review of the residents electronic medical record revealed a physician's order for admission to Elite Hospice on 03/27/24. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 147 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 29, 2025Standard and complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 17, 2025Complaint1 finding
- May 16, 2024Standard and complaint6 findings
- Mar 10, 2023Standard6 findings
- Jan 19, 2023Complaint3 findings
- May 16, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Nov 10, 2021Standard15 findings
- Oct 11, 2021Complaint2 findings
Show the 24 earlier surveys
- Sep 28, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Jul 9, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Feb 3, 2021Complaint5 findings
- Sep 25, 2020Standard19 findings
- Aug 11, 2020Complaint5 findings
- Apr 18, 2019Standard5 findings
- Jul 13, 2018Standard and complaint4 findings
- Feb 26, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 24, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Mar 16, 2017Standard1 finding
- Apr 7, 2016Complaint3 findings
- Feb 26, 2016Standard and complaint7 findings
- Jun 18, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Mar 13, 2015Standard5 findings
- May 16, 2014Standard10 findings
- Nov 21, 2013—2 findings
- Aug 23, 2013—3 findings
- Apr 26, 2013—6 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 8, 2013—1 finding
- Oct 30, 2012—5 findings
- Mar 30, 2012—4 findings
- Oct 13, 2011—2 findings
- Apr 22, 2011—15 findings
- Sep 14, 2010—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction