The Springs of Brinkley
Brinkley, Arkansas · CCN 045430
22 surveys since 2012, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 94
- Surveys
- 22
- Harm or worse
- 6
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 116
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- THE SPRINGS ARKANSAS
- County
- Monroe · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2009
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 85 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Arkansas.
Last survey on record
Mar 19, 2026
235 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.29 | 3.91 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.56 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 65.1% | 49.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $17,515 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J14.8% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G14.8% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1047.6% | E733.3% | F29.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5802×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at The Springs of Brinkley, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF656Feb 23, 2026
Based on record review, observation, interview, and video review, the facility failed to ensure effective care planned interventions were created and implemented following new on-set of wandering and/or elopement associated behaviors, in which Resident #1 attempted on multiple occasions to exit the facility and voiced intent to exit the facility in the future. At the time of the survey, there were 8 residents in the secured unit at risk of eloping. It was determined the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Jul 17, 2025
Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent resident to resident abuse for two (Resident #1 and Resident #3) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: Resident #1: A review of Resident #1’s admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 07/25/2024, with diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction) and Parkinson’s disease, with dyskinesia (involuntary muscle movements). A review of Resident #1’s quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/19/2025, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 05, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 25, 2023
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen area air conditioner intake filter and vents were clean to prevent potential food borne illness. This failed practice had the potential to affect 47 residents who received food from the kitchen (total census: 49), according to the Diet List provided by the Dietary Manager on 08/21/23 at 10:55 AM. The findings are: 1. On 08/21/23 at 11:03 AM, the following observations were made in the Kitchen: a. Observed the air conditioner unit located in the middle of kitchen area. The air intake filter and vents had a dark brown/black substance and dark brown fuzzy particles of debris stuck to the vents which was over the food prep table area. b. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF814Aug 25, 2023
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure waste was properly contained in a dumpster with the door and lid closed to reduce the potential of insect and/or rodent infestation. The failed practice had the ability to affect all 49 residents who resided in the facility according to the Resident Census and Conditions of Residents provided by the Administrator on 08/25/23 at 1:05 PM. The findings are: 1. On 08/24/23 at 8:52 AM, upon exiting the back door of the building, the ground was littered with cigarette butts. To the right on the way to the dumpster was a brown cardboard box. The door of the dumpster was open with a white bag protruding from the opening. Located next to the dumpster, on the ground was an additional bag of trash. 2. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 25, 2022
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff wash hands before and during meal serving trays, staff did not touch their face or clothes before handling clean equipment or food ,and dented cans were removed to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. The failed practices had the potential to affect 40 residents who received trays as documented on a list provided by Administrator documented on 5/23/22 at 2:18 PM. The findings are: 1. On 5/23/22 at 10:55 AM., the following observations were made on initial rounds with Dietary Employee (DE) #1: a. In the dry storage area there was a large container labeled flour. There was no date on the label. […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 94 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 19, 2026Standard1 finding
- Feb 23, 2026Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 17, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 4, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Aug 15, 2024Standard10 findings
- Aug 25, 2023Standard6 findings
- Oct 25, 2022Complaint2 findings
- May 25, 2022Standard7 findings
Show the 14 earlier surveys
- Apr 22, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Mar 19, 2021Standard6 findings
- Sep 25, 2020Complaint3 findings
- Feb 14, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Oct 10, 2019Standard8 findings
- Oct 25, 2018Standard4 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 8, 2017Standard1 finding
- Oct 13, 2016Standard2 findings
- Dec 4, 2015Standard5 findings
- Aug 10, 2015Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
- Oct 31, 2014Standard13 findings
- Jan 16, 2014—8 findings
- Apr 25, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 20, 2012—6 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction