Deficiency Index

The Springs Batesville

Batesville, Arkansas · CCN 045203

34 surveys since 2011, 12 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
150
Surveys
34
Harm or worse
12
Immediate jeopardy
10
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy10

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file29/34

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
150
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
THE SPRINGS ARKANSAS
County
Independence · rural
Medicare-certified since
1992

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 46 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Arkansas.

Last survey on record

Aug 28, 2025

438 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.163.82
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.29—
Annual nurse turnover57.3%49.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD421.1%E1368.4%F210.5%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 19 of the 150 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8032×

    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.

  • F5581×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F6361×

    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Springs Batesville, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF880Jan 28, 2022

    A. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure implementation of infection prevention and control practices to prevent the potential transmission of COVID-19, as evidenced by failure to ensure COVID-19 isolation precautions were followed and personal protective equipment (PPE) was readily available for staff caring for COVID-positive residents for 4 (Residents #3, 4, 5, and 6) of 4 sampled residents who resided on the 500 Hall Dementia Unit and were COVID-positive The failed practices resulted in Immediate Jeopardy, which caused or could have caused serious harm, injury, or death to 8 COVID-negative residents who resided on the 500 Hall Dementia Unit, according to a list provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 1/26/22 at 10:30 AM. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Oct 8, 2021

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was promptly transferred to the hospital as ordered by the Hospice Physician after a fall with injury to prevent a delay in treatment and failed to ensure neurological assessments were consistently completed after the fall with injury occurred to monitor for any delayed signs and symptoms of head injury for 1 (Resident #2) of 5 (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4 and #5) case mix residents who were at risk for falls and were dependent on staff for their care. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 23, 2024

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were discarded by their use by date; food items were stored and served in a manner to prevent cross contamination; and hair covering for the face and head were worn at all times in 1 of 1 kitchen. The findings are: On 05/20/2024 at 10:35 AM, Dietary Aide #5 was observed with facial hair which was uncovered. On 05/20/2024 at 10:45 AM, a previously opened package containing tortillas was observed on the top shelf of the bread rack. The use by date was 05/14/2024. On 05/20/2024 at 10:50 AM, a one-pound bag of diced onion was observed on the shelf of the walk in refrigerator. The use by date was 05/13/2024. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 7, 2023

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen floor was maintained in clean, sanitary condition for food preparation to prevent the potential for food borne illnesses for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; the refrigerator temperature and dairy products stored in the refrigerator were maintained at 41 degrees Fahrenheit or below; food items stored in the freezer were sealed or covered to prevent the potential for cross contamination or freezer burn, employees washed their hands and changed gloves when contaminated to decrease the potential for food borne illness for residents receiving food from 1 of 1 kitchen and the ice machine was maintained in clean condition to prevent the potential contamination of residents' beverages. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF803Jan 28, 2022

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served in accordance with the planned, written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the residents for 1 of 2 meals observed. These failed practices had the potential to affect 6 residents who received pureed diets, 24 residents who received mechanical soft diets and 59 residents who received regular diets from the kitchen (total census: 91), according to a list provided by the Dietary Supervisor on 1/6/2022. The findings are: 1. On 1/5/2022, the menu for the supper meal documented the residents on regular diets and mechanical soft diets were to receive a slice of lasagna and residents on pureed diets were to receive 8 ounces (oz) of lasagna each. a. […]

Read 32 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 32 of 150 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 28, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Feb 5, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 1, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • May 23, 2024Standard14 findings
  • Apr 7, 2023Standard5 findings
  • Nov 18, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 8, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 28, 2022Standard and complaint10 findings · 1 harm
Show the 26 earlier surveys
  • Oct 26, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 8, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 16, 2021Infection control6 findings
  • May 20, 2021Infection control4 findings
  • Dec 23, 2020Complaint4 findings
  • Nov 12, 2020Standard11 findings
  • Sep 8, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Aug 5, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 3, 2020Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 2, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • May 8, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Jul 20, 2018Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Feb 28, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 11, 2018Complaint14 findings · 6 harm
  • Jul 28, 2017Standard and complaint5 findings · 2 harm
  • Mar 10, 2017Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 7, 2016Standard9 findings
  • Feb 26, 2016Complaint8 findings
  • Dec 18, 2015Standard7 findings
  • Feb 11, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 24, 2014Standard5 findings
  • Feb 27, 2014—3 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 22, 2013—5 findings
  • Jan 17, 2013—1 finding
  • Nov 10, 2011—8 findings
  • Sep 7, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction