The Blossoms at Woodland Hills Rehab & Nursing Cen
Little Rock, Arkansas · CCN 045259
54 surveys since 2010, 17 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 258
- Surveys
- 54
- Harm or worse
- 17
- Immediate jeopardy
- 12
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 140
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- THE BLOSSOMS REHAB & NURSING CENTER
- County
- Pulaski
- Medicare-certified since
- 1994
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 46 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Arkansas.
Last survey on record
Apr 21, 2026
202 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.26 | 3.82 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.46 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 79.8% | 49.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $88,852 across 1 penalty
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K13.2% | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1445.2% | E1445.2% | F26.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6773×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F7613×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at The Blossoms at Woodland Hills Rehab & Nursing Cen, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF600Apr 21, 2026
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from neglect. Specifically, the facility failed to obtain a urine sample in a timely manner to rule out a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) for Resident #1 and failure to order an antibiotic in a timely manner for Resident #1 to treat a UTIIt was determined the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to eCFR S483.12(Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation) at a scope and severity of K.The IJ began on [DATE] at 6:02 PM, when Resident #1 had a written physician order to obtain a Urinary Analysis (UA) to rule out a UTI. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 3, 2025
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that cross contamination did not occur during lunch service for one of one kitchen observed. The findings include: On 04/02/2025 at 11:07 AM, this surveyor observed Dietary Aide (DA) #4 using bare hands to place four slices of cake in bags. DA #4 then placed the bagged cake slices in a stainless-steel bin. The Dietary Manager requested five (5) slices of cake for purees. With bare hands, DA #4 added 5 slices of cake to the stainless-steel container for puree. DA #4 was observed with cake coated on all ten fingertips. The Dietary Manager proceeded to use the cake for puree diets in the building. This surveyor observed the cake being served for all diets in the facility, during the lunch meal service. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Feb 16, 2024
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items stored in the refrigerator and storage area were covered or sealed to maintain freshness and prevent potential cross contamination of food and beverages; expired food items were promptly removed/discarded by the expiration or use by dates; kitchen vents were cleaned to provide a sanitary environment for food preparation; floors, kitchen walls, door frames and baseboards were free of rotten wood, chipped floor tiles, debris, rust, and dirt; 2 of 2 ice scoop holders, and 1 of 2 ice machines were maintained in clean and sanitary condition to prevent food and beverages contamination; and hot food items were maintained at or above 135 degrees Fahrenheit while awaiting service to prevent potential food borne illness for… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Oct 7, 2022
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure they did not use bare hands to transfer food in 1 of 1 kitchen to prevent the potential for food borne illnesses. This failed practice had the potential to effect 47 residents who received a tray from the kitchen according to a list provided by The Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/07/22. The findings are: a. On 10/07/22 at 8:45 AM, The Dietary Manager provided a lunch menu dated 10/07/22. It documented, .Fresh Cantaloupe . b. On 10/07/22 at 12:00 PM, The Surveyor walked in the kitchen. Dietary Employee #1 was picking up cantaloupe with an ungloved hand putting it into bowls. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Oct 28, 2021
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff wore hair coverings while preparing and or serving food, expired food items were removed / discarded on or before the expiration or use by dates, food items stored in the freezer and refrigerator were sealed and dated and food preparation equipment was maintained in clean condition to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. These failed practices had the potential to affect 41 residents who received a meal tray from the kitchen as documented on a list provided by the Director of Nursing on [DATE] at 7:43 AM. The findings are: 1. On [DATE] at 10:35 AM, the following observations were made during the initial kitchen tour: a. […]
Read 36 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 36 of 258 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 21, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 12, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jun 26, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Apr 3, 2025Standard6 findings
- Dec 4, 2024Complaint5 findings
- Feb 16, 2024Standard and complaint16 findings
- Jan 9, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Feb 10, 2023Complaint2 findings
Show the 46 earlier surveys
- Feb 3, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Dec 1, 2022Standard2 findings
- Oct 7, 2022Complaint5 findings
- Apr 29, 2022Standard1 finding
- Jan 20, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Oct 28, 2021Standard and complaint12 findings
- Apr 30, 2021Standard12 findings
- Mar 12, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jul 31, 2020Complaint1 finding
- May 29, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Apr 6, 2020Complaint6 findings · 4 harm
- Mar 6, 2020Standard16 findings
- Dec 27, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jun 27, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 25, 2019Standard9 findings
- Jun 1, 2018Complaint1 finding
- May 8, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Mar 21, 2018Complaint5 findings
- Feb 9, 2018Standard6 findings
- Jul 17, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Mar 31, 2017Complaint4 findings
- Feb 10, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Dec 16, 2016Standard6 findings
- Nov 7, 2016Complaint4 findings · 3 harm
- Oct 7, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 24, 2016Complaint3 findings
- Jul 14, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 9, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Oct 30, 2015Standard20 findings · 2 harm
- Oct 1, 2015Complaint1 finding
- May 21, 2015Complaint3 findings
- Dec 30, 2014Standard and complaint15 findings
- Oct 30, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Mar 6, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Jan 14, 2014—16 findings
- Sep 26, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 3, 2013—17 findings · 3 harm
- Apr 18, 2013—9 findings
- Jun 28, 2012—4 findings
- Jun 7, 2012—5 findings
- Mar 23, 2012—17 findings
- Mar 15, 2012—2 findings
- Jun 30, 2011—3 findings
- May 19, 2011—1 finding
- Apr 27, 2011—1 finding
- Oct 8, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction