Deficiency Index

The Orchards at Big Rapids

Big Rapids, Michigan · CCN 235459

27 surveys since 2011, 17 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
160
Surveys
27
Harm or worse
17
Immediate jeopardy
5
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy5

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file22/27

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
100
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
THE ORCHARDS MICHIGAN
County
Mecosta · rural
Medicare-certified since
1987

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 89 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Michigan.

Last survey on record

Apr 22, 2026

201 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.313.66
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.65—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$55,711 across 1 penalty
Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ12.6%K—L—
Actual harmG410.5%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2155.3%E718.4%F513.2%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 38 of the 160 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8124×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F6583×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8423×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Orchards at Big Rapids, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF880Feb 1, 2022

    This citation has two separate deficient practice statements, A. and B. A. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1) have an accurate and timely infection tracking and monitoring system, 2) follow established COVID-19 testing guidelines per facility policy, 3) implement appropriate transmission-based precaution protocols (including Personal Protective Equipment [PPE] and resident room signage), and 4) practice appropriate hand hygiene. This deficient practice was identified as an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) due to the failed facility COVID-19 tracking and testing systems had the likelihood to result in further infectious outbreaks for all residents and staff. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Feb 17, 2023

    This citation has 3 DPS statements. This citation refers in part to MI00133328: DPS#1 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent accidents and hazards for 1 resident (R7) resulting in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began on 1/19/23, due to the facility's lack of policies and procedures to prevent hot liquid burns for R7. This deficient practice led to R7 experiencing multiple third degree burns and unnecessary pain and disfigurement and the potential for other residents in the facility to be at risk from burn, pain and injury. Findings include: A review of R7's Face Sheet, dated 2/15/23, revealed R7 was an [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Mar 13, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed prevent a facility-acquired pressure ulcer, and measure, assess and promote the healing with an appropriate dressing change for one resident (Resident #63) of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. This deficient practice resulted in Resident #63 developing an unstageable pressure ulcer on the heel. Findings include: The facility provided a policy for Pressure Injuries: Assessment, Prevention and Treatment (undated and unsigned) for review. The policy reflected, 2. Skin will be assessed routinely for the presence of developing pressure injuries and documented on the Nursing Skin Tool .12. Float heels - keep heels off the bed .15. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF656Feb 17, 2023

    Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-center care plans for 3 residents (R12, R51 and R26) resulting ineffective and unimplemented care plans leading to ongoing falls, injury and pain for R12 and R51 and prolonged use of a feeding tube, anxiety and weight gain for R26 and the potential for all facility residents to not receive care and services to reach their highest potential. Findings include: R12 Review of R12's face sheet dated 2/14/23 revealed she was a [AGE] year old resident who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included: dementia, unsteadiness on feet, restlessness and agitation, difficulty in walking, and fracture of the right… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Feb 17, 2023

    This citation has two Deficient Practice Statements (DPS) DPS #1 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure enabling care and services were provided to one Resident (Resident #26 (R26)) receiving nutrition through a feeding tube to restore oral eating skills resulting in prolonged use of a feeding tube and anxiety and the potential for all facility residents with nutrition related needs to not receive enabling care and services to reach their highest practicalable potential. Findings: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] reflected that R26 was originally admitted to the facility 8/5/20 with pertinent diagnoses that included history of stroke with impairment to one side of the body. […]

Read 36 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 36 of 160 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 22, 2026Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Mar 13, 2025Standard4 findings
  • Mar 13, 2024Standard and complaint9 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 7, 2023Complaint3 findings
  • Feb 17, 2023Standard13 findings · 4 harm
  • Aug 24, 2022Complaint4 findings
  • Feb 1, 2022Standard19 findings · 2 harm
  • Nov 17, 2021Complaint1 finding
Show the 19 earlier surveys
  • Nov 4, 2021Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 23, 2020Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 5, 2020Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Jul 10, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 5, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Dec 18, 2018Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 8, 2017Standard13 findings · 3 harm
  • Jul 14, 2017Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 7, 2016Standard21 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 19, 2015Standard7 findings
  • Aug 14, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 9, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Jan 17, 2014Standard5 findings
  • Jul 12, 2013—2 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 8, 2013—5 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 13, 2012—2 findings
  • May 18, 2012—3 findings
  • Mar 16, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 15, 2011—9 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction