Deficiency Index

The Oaks-Brevard

Brevard, North Carolina · CCN 345462

23 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2021.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
115
Surveys
23
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file20/23

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
110
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
PRUITTHEALTH
County
Transylvania · rural
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 125 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in North Carolina.

Last survey on record

Mar 5, 2026

249 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.303.47
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.15—
Annual nurse turnover25.8%49.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$6,936 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1970.4%E622.2%F13.7%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B13.7%C—
CMS’s current file: 27 of the 115 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F7562×

    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F5521×

    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.

  • F5541×

    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.

  • F5611×

    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Oaks-Brevard, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Jun 16, 2021

    Based on record review, staff, Physician Assistant (PA) and Physician interviews, the facility failed to identify the urgent need for medical attention or notify the physician when an acute change was first identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #1). Resident #1 was admitted to the hospital on 05/27/21 and diagnosed with an impacted (occurs when the broken ends of the bone are jammed together by the force of the injury), angulated (where the normal axis of the bone has been altered causing the distal portion of the bone to point off in the opposite direction) and comminuted (the bone has broken into three or more pieces and in most cases, the number of bone fragments corresponds with the amount of force needed to break the bone) right femoral diaphyseal (bone… […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jun 16, 2021

    Based on observations, record review and physician and staff interviews, the facility failed to prevent a cognitively impaired resident with known wandering and exiting seeking behaviors from exiting the facility unsupervised on three separate occasions. This affected 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #2). While Resident #2 was outside unattended, there was a high likelihood for serious injury. The findings included: Resident #2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease and history of falls. A care plan initiated on 01/09/21 noted Resident #2 was at risk for falls related to generalized weakness, poor safety awareness, history of falls and an actual fall on 01/09/21 with the goal he would not sustain an injury. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF680Dec 18, 2024

    Based on staff interviews, the facility failed to have a qualified professionals to direct the facility's activity program. This practice had the potential to affect all of the residents at the facility. The findings included: On 12/16/24 at 10:35 AM an interview was conducted with the Activity Director (AD). She stated that she had worked at the facility for the past several years as a nursing assistant and then became the Life Enrichment Specialist on the memory care unit around May 2023 and then moved into the AD position for the facility in December 2023 after the previous AD resigned. She stated she had never received any formal activities training from the facility, completed any state training courses, and to her knowledge was not certified. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF552Mar 5, 2026

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to obtain consent and inform the resident or Responsible Party in advance of the risks and benefits of psychotropic medications prior to initiation for 6 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents #3, #7, #6, #51, #2, and #10). The findings included:1. a. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included generalized anxiety disorder.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had severe cognitive impairment. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF565Dec 18, 2024

    Based on record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to resolve and communicate the facility's efforts to address repeated concerns and/or suggestions voiced by residents during Resident Council meetings for 12 of 14 months reviewed (October 2023, November 2023, January 2024, February 2024, March 2024, April 2024, May 2024, June 2024, July 2024, August 2024, October 2024, and November 2024). Findings included: Review of the Resident Council Minutes for the period 10/26/23 through 11/21/24 revealed the following: a. The Resident Council meeting minutes dated 10/26/23 revealed the section for old business noted resident concerns with dietary and showers. There was no indication of the facility's response to these concerns listed under old business. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 115 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 5, 2026Standard4 findings
  • Dec 18, 2024Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Aug 17, 2023Standard and complaint14 findings
  • Jan 7, 2022Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Jun 16, 2021Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 23, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • May 21, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jan 10, 2020Standard and complaint5 findings
Show the 15 earlier surveys
  • Jan 11, 2019Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Jun 28, 2018Complaint3 findings
  • Feb 2, 2018Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Apr 5, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 2, 2016Standard6 findings
  • Apr 25, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 24, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 22, 2015Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Sep 25, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Jun 5, 2014Complaint4 findings
  • Jul 11, 2013—2 findings
  • Apr 27, 2012—16 findings
  • Dec 19, 2011—1 finding
  • Jul 19, 2011—2 findings
  • Jun 23, 2011—10 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction