The Oaks at Jamestown
Hudsonville, Michigan · CCN 235735
1 survey since 2026, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 3
- Surveys
- 1
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 58
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES
- County
- Ottawa
- Medicare-certified since
- 2024
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=3, floor 20).
Last survey on record
—
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.11 | 3.86 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.33 | — |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at The Oaks at Jamestown, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF842Jul 15, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate medical records for three residents (R8, R18, and R14) of seven residents reviewed for accurate medical records. Findings include: R14 Review of a Face Sheet revealed R14 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included dementia and surgical aftercare following surgery on the skin removing left ankle mass. In an observation and interview on 7/13/2026 at 11:19 AM on the outside patio, R14's left foot and ankle were wrapped with an intact dressing. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jul 15, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 3 residents (R3, R57, & R58) out of three residents reviewed for EBP.Findings include:During an observation on 7/13/2026 at 9:15 AM, the 100 hall was observed. No evidence of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was noted outside any of the residents' rooms. During an observation on 7/13/2026 at 11:30 AM, movable towers of PPE were noted outside the rooms of three residents (R3, R57, R58). During an interview on 7/13/2026 at 11:40 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) D reported the PPE had been placed for residents who required EBP because it had not been there previously. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF554Jul 15, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess one resident (R49) of two residents reviewed for self-administration of medication.Findings include:Review of a Face Sheet revealed R49 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included gastro-esophageal reflux disease and heart failure. Review of R49's Physician's Orders revealed an active order started 1/29/2025 for Gas Relief (simethicone) tablet, chewable, 125mg, take twice a day.In an observation and interview on 7/13/2026 at 9:36 AM in R49's room, a round white pill was visible in a medication cup on the table next to R49 and within reach with no staff present. […]
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 15, 2026Standard3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction