Deficiency Index

The Laurels of Pender

Burgaw, North Carolina · CCN 345298

16 surveys since 2010, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
52
Surveys
16
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/16

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
98
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE
County
Pender
Medicare-certified since
1989

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=12, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jan 15, 2026

298 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.093.42
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.69—
Annual nurse turnover35.5%51.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD880.0%E220.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 10 of the 52 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Laurels of Pender, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Jan 15, 2026

    Based on observations, manufacturer's instructions, and staff interviews, the facility failed to record an opened date on multi-dose insulin pen injectors and an insulin vial for 3 of 4 medication carts that were reviewed for medication storage (100 and 400 hall medication carts). Findings included: a) An observation of the 400-hall medication cart on 01/14/26 at 8:20 AM with Medication Aide #3 revealed the follow medications: Humalog prefilled insulin pen was opened with no opened dateLantus prefilled insulin pen was opened with no opened date. The manufacturer's instructions for both the Humalog and Lantus insulin pens read to discard after 28 days once opened. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jan 15, 2026

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to label and date opened packages of food in 2 of 2 freezers (the front freezer and the outside freezer), label and date opened packages of food in 1 of 1 dry goods storage room, and discard expired foods stored for use in 2 of 2 nourishment room refrigerators (100 and 400 hall nourishment rooms). This deficient practice had the potential to affect the food served to the residents.The findings included:An initial tour of the kitchen was conducted on 1/12/26 at 9:25 AM in the presence of the Dietary Manager.a). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF552Jan 15, 2026

    Based on record review, Nurse Practitioner and staff interviews, the facility failed to obtain and document consent for treatment with psychotropic medications and review with the resident or resident representative in advance of the risks versus benefits of psychotropic medications (any medication that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) prior to administration of psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #98). Findings included: Resident #98 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder, dementia and anxiety. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Jan 15, 2026

    Based on observation, record review, and staff, and the Medical Director's interview, the facility failed to follow the physician's order for the care of a surgical wound for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for wound care (Resident #33).Findings included: The hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] for Resident #33 revealed; Aquacel (a wound dressing that promotes a moist healing environment) to remain in place to the left surgical wound for seven days and replace with new Aquacel. Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a left femur fracture with surgical repair. A physician's order dated 1/1/26 entered by the Wound Nurse for Resident #33 revealed to cleanse the wound to the left lateral thigh with generic wound cleanser. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF698Jan 15, 2026

    Based on observations, record review, resident and staff and Nurse Practitioner interviews, the facility failed to obtain orders to assess and manage a new arterial venous (A/V) fistula (A surgical connection of an artery to a vein, usually in the arm, to create a long-lasting access point for dialysis needles) that was maturing for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident #7). Findings included: A history and physical assessment from the hospital dated 12/08/25 revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the hospital with possible gastrointestinal bleed. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 52 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 15, 2026Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Sep 3, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • May 4, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Jan 28, 2022Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Oct 9, 2019Standard1 finding
  • May 23, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 25, 2017Standard6 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 2, 2016Standard5 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
  • May 19, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 21, 2015Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Mar 9, 2015Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Sep 17, 2014Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Aug 15, 2013—1 finding
  • Sep 20, 2012—3 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 25, 2011—4 findings
  • Sep 16, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction