The King's Daughters & Sons Nursing Home
Durant, Oklahoma · CCN 375397
16 surveys since 2011, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 137
- Surveys
- 16
- Harm or worse
- 9
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 65
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Bryan · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2001
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 50 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Oklahoma.
Last survey on record
Jun 19, 2025
508 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.48 | 3.80 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.55 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 31.6% | 53.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $15,249 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J15.6% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D738.9% | E738.9% | F316.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at The King's Daughters & Sons Nursing Home, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Feb 6, 2024
On 02/01/24 an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure residents who had fallen had interventions in place to prevent the recurrence of falls. The facility failed to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions and modify the care plan with each fall. The facility failed to conduct a root cause analysis and/or evaluate the cause for each fall. The facility did not have a fall prevention program, nor have the staff received education regarding falls and fall prevention in the last 12 months. Res #36 had 26 falls from 05/17/23 to 01/27/24. Res #36 had 19 falls prior to sustaining a left hip fracture on 11/19/23 and six falls after sustaining the fracture. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF607Feb 6, 2024
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy and ensure background checks were completed for new hires. The administrator identified 42 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: The Abuse Prohibition/Unusual Occurrence Policy and Procedure policy, undated, read in part, .Screening All potential employees will be screened for a history of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents as defined by the applicable requirements .Nursing Home will obtain OSBI checks, attempt to obtain information from prior employers, current employers and licensing boards and registries . The Employee Seniority Report, dated 01/30/24, documented the following: a. CNA #1 was hired on 02/11/23. b. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF835Feb 6, 2024
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to have an effective administration to use it's resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well being of each resident. The facility failed to ensure: a. to follow their abuse policy and ensure background checks were completed for new hires; b. MDS assessments accurately reflected the residents' status; c. care plans were updated and revised; d. physician orders were followed; e. supervision was provided to help prevent accidents, falls were thoroughly investigated to determine root causes, fall interventions were modified/revised, and to monitor effectiveness of interventions to prevent falls; f. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Feb 6, 2024
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their Legionnaires prevention policy. The administrator identified 42 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A Legionella Water Management Program dated September 2022, read in parts, .Our facility is committed to prevent, detection and control of water-borne contaminants, including Legionella .As part of the infection prevention and control program, our facility has a water management program, which is overseen by the water management team .The water management team consists of at least the following personnel: a. The infection preventionist; b. The administrator; c. The medical director (or designee); d. The director of maintenance; and e. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF641Feb 6, 2024
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments accurately reflected the residents' status for three (#1, 6, and #14) of 15 residents whose assessments were reviewed. The administrator identified 42 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #1 had diagnoses which included atherosclerotic heart disease, old myocardial infarction, and cerebral infarction. A physician order, dated 12/20/23, documented Brilinta (an antiplatelet medication) administer 90 mg BID for MI/CVA prevention. An admission assessment dated [DATE], documented the resident was severly impaired with cognition and required extensive assistance with ADLs. The assessment did not document the resident was receiving an antiplatelet medication. […]
Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 137 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 19, 2025Standard and complaint2 findings
- Feb 6, 2024Standard13 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 5, 2023Standard3 findings
- Aug 5, 2021Standard and complaint3 findings
- Jul 11, 2019Standard15 findings
- May 30, 2018Standard11 findings · 2 harm
- Jun 22, 2017Standard2 findings
- May 16, 2017Complaint2 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
- Jul 28, 2016Standard3 findings
- Jun 12, 2015Standard2 findings
- Jun 17, 2014Standard2 findings
- Apr 18, 2014Standard37 findings · 4 harm
- May 22, 2013Standard16 findings
- Nov 29, 2012—5 findings
- Mar 23, 2012—12 findings · 2 harm
- Feb 17, 2011—9 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction