Deficiency Index

The Grove at Carvalho

Fall River, Massachusetts · CCN 225453

22 surveys since 2011, 19 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
150
Surveys
22
Harm or worse
19
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file17/22

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
112
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Bristol
Medicare-certified since
1990

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
1
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 80 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Massachusetts.

Last survey on record

Apr 8, 2026

215 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.423.64
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.42—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$39,082 across 7 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG24.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2655.3%E1531.9%F24.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B12.1%C12.1%
CMS’s current file: 47 of the 150 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5803×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6583×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Grove at Carvalho, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF656Feb 3, 2026

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who per rehabilitation staff required the use of a mechanical lift for all transfers, and per facility policy two staff members were required to complete lift transfers, the facility failed to ensure that 1) Resident #1's individualized comprehensive plan of care, which included his/her care Kardex, clearly indicated the number of staff members required to provide assistance during the transfers, and as a result one staff member attempted to transfer him/her alone, he/she fell, and sustained a fracture to his/her left ankle, and 2) failed to ensure they developed and implemented a comprehensive plan of care related to Resident #1's ankle fracture, that accurately identified care and treatment needs… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 3, 2026

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who required the use of a Sit/Stand Lift (mobility aid that helps people transition safely from sitting to standing), for all transfers, with two staff members present to assist and complete the transfer, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with the necessary level of staff assistance, in accordance with facility policy, to maintain his/her safety and prevent an incident/accident resulting in a significant injury. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF838Feb 19, 2025

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to conduct and implement a comprehensive facility wide assessment that was inclusive of resources necessary to provide both emergency and day to day care of the population the facility currently serves. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) memo titled Revised Guidance for Long-Term Care Facility Assessment Requirements, dated 6/18/24, indicated but was not limited to: -In conducting the facility assessment, the facility must ensure active involvement of the following participants in the process: - The facility's resident population, including, but not limited to: - The care required by the resident population; - The physical environment, equipment, services, and other physical plant… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF867Feb 19, 2025

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the Quality Assurance Committee identified quality deficient areas and implemented an appropriate corrective action plan, to ensure satisfactory outcomes. Specifically, the facility failed to develop and implement a Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan and a Performance Improvement Project (PIP) that focused on a high risk or problem-prone area identified through data collection and analysis. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Apr 8, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Maintain an infection prevention and control program with a complete system of surveillance to identify any trends of actual or potential infections within the facility; and 2. […]

Read 35 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 35 of 150 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 8, 2026Standard5 findings
  • Feb 3, 2026Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 19, 2025Standard22 findings
  • Sep 10, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 27, 2023Standard13 findings
  • Nov 19, 2021Standard6 findings
  • Sep 30, 2020Infection control7 findings
  • Aug 30, 2019Complaint5 findings
Show the 14 earlier surveys
  • Apr 11, 2019Standard9 findings
  • Apr 8, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 3, 2018Complaint8 findings · 4 harm
  • Aug 10, 2018Complaint4 findings
  • Dec 8, 2017Standard22 findings · 5 harm
  • May 19, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 16, 2016Standard7 findings · 2 harm
  • May 1, 2015Standard5 findings
  • May 13, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Mar 24, 2014Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Mar 8, 2013—4 findings
  • Jan 24, 2012—6 findings · 4 harm
  • Mar 28, 2011—4 findings
  • Jan 5, 2011—10 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction