Deficiency Index

The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing At Rome

Rome, New York · CCN 335589

26 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
143
Surveys
26
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file20/26

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
160
Ownership
For profit - Individual
Chain
THE GRAND HEALTHCARE
County
Oneida
Medicare-certified since
1976

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
1
Quality measures
1

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 259 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in New York.

Last survey on record

Apr 17, 2026

206 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.093.37
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.38—
Annual nurse turnover40.8%33.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$77,332 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ25.3%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2463.2%E1231.6%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 38 of the 143 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6103×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

  • F6773×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6862×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing At Rome, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF627Nov 5, 2025

    Based on record review and interviews during the abbreviated survey (Complaint ID# 2613592), the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to residents to ensure safe and orderly transfers or discharges from the facility for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #2). Specifically, Resident #2 was discharged on 05/19/2025 to the Department of Social Services via family transportation without consulting the Department of Social Services to ensure the plan met the resident's health and safety needs, and preferences. The resident had no identification, and no supportive services in place, and was discharged without proper education and supplies to manage their diabetes and diabetic wounds. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Oct 25, 2023

    Based on record review and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00304388), the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). Specifically, Resident #1 had a history of aspiration (inhalation of foods/fluids into the lungs) risk, was on an altered consistency diet (chopped solids) and required supervision and assistance with eating. On 4/26/2023, the resident was provided a sandwich and was not supervised while eating. Subsequently, approximately 30 minutes later, the resident was found without signs of life (no pulse or respirations), with food in their mouth, and was pronounced deceased . […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689May 10, 2021

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY 212) conducted on 5/10/21, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). Specifically, Resident #1 had a history of seeking out the unit showers and wandered unsupervised to another unit where they were found in the shower. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #1 as they sustained first and second degree [CONDITION(S)] from the shower water. Findings include: The Routine Resident Checks policy dated 1/2021 documented the residents will be maintained in a safe environment that protects residents from actual harm. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF610Apr 17, 2026

    Based on record review and interviews (iQIES Intake 2740528), the facility failed to ensure alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated for three (3) of four (4) residents (Residents #11, #21, and #37) reviewed. Specifically, it was reported Certified Nurse Aide #31 was heard calling Resident #21 a liar and there was no documented evidence the facility investigated the allegation to rule out abuse; Resident #11 reported to several staff members that Licensed Practical Nurse #36 intentionally did not provide them with their pain medication and the allegation was not reported to administration to ensure an investigation was completed to rule out neglect or mistreatment; and Resident #37 used a broken plate to threaten another resident and there… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF698Apr 17, 2026

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who required dialysis services (filtration of blood when the kidneys do not work) received such services consistent with professional standards of practice for two (2) of two (2) residents (Residents #3 and #16) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #3 and #16 received hemodialysis treatments at a community-based dialysis center and did not have consistent on-going assessments or oversight before and after dialysis treatments and there was no documented evidence the resident's Tesio catheter (access site for dialysis treatment) was routinely assessed. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 143 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 17, 2026Standard and complaint11 findings
  • Nov 5, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 1, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 28, 2024Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Oct 25, 2023Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 11, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 15, 2022Standard13 findings
  • Mar 15, 2022Complaint5 findings
Show the 18 earlier surveys
  • May 10, 2021Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 8, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 28, 2020Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 24, 2020Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Aug 22, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 30, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 10, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 18, 2018Standard1 finding
  • Jan 16, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • May 2, 2017Standard11 findings
  • Jan 15, 2016Standard7 findings
  • Feb 19, 2015Standard and complaint12 findings
  • May 30, 2014Complaint4 findings
  • Mar 3, 2014Standard and complaint11 findings
  • Jan 16, 2013—13 findings
  • Apr 6, 2012—10 findings
  • May 18, 2011—1 finding
  • Feb 25, 2011—12 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction