Deficiency Index

Temple Manor Nursing Home

Temple, Oklahoma · CCN 375429

19 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
51
Surveys
19
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file17/19

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
48
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
SOUTHWEST LTC
County
Cotton
Medicare-certified since
2003

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
1
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jan 24, 2025

654 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day2.843.80
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.26—
Annual nurse turnover60.0%53.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD150.0%E150.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 2 of the 51 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Temple Manor Nursing Home, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Jan 24, 2025

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure storage and maintenance closets containing insulin syringes and hazardous chemicals remained locked in order to protect residents. The administrator reported 37 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Storage Areas, Maintenance policy, dated December 2009, read in part, Maintenance storage areas shall be maintained in a clean and safe manner. A Hazardous Areas, Devices and Equipment policy, dated July 2017, read in parts, A hazard is defined as anything in the environment that has the potential to cause injury or illness .Sharp objects that are accessible to vulnerable residents .Open areas or items that should be locked when not in use .Access to toxic chemicals .Disabled locks. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF695Dec 22, 2023

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was labeled and dated, per the facility policy and professional standards of care, for two (#9 and #19) of three residents reviewed for respiratory services. Findings: The facility's Oxygen Administration policy, dated 10/2020, read in part, .After completing the oxygen setup or adjustment, the following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record .The date and time that the procedure was performed .The name and title of the individual who performed the procedure .The rate of oxygen flow, route and rationale .The frequency and duration of the treatment . 1. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF644Jan 5, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to refer a resident, with a newly diagnosed mental disorder, to the Oklahoma Health Care Authority (OHCA)/Level of Care Evaluation Unit (LOCEU) for a level II resident assessment for one (#33) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for PASRR screening. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 21 residents who received antidepressant medications. Findings: The OHCA policy and rules for PASRR screening process, dated 09/01/17, read in parts, .a new condition of intellectual disabilities or mental illness must be referred to LOCEU by the nursing facility for determination of the need for the level II assessment .The facility's failure to refer such individuals for a level II assessment may… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF645Jan 5, 2022

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to put the proper diagnosis [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The level I PASRR screening conducted by the facility did not include the resident's diagnosis [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 01/05/22, identified 21 residents who received antidepressant medications. The administrator identified 34 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admission diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] The level I PASRR Screen, dated 03/03/21, read in parts, .Question 2 (with a Yes or No response) diagnosis [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] .depressive disorder .) The question documented an answer of, No. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 51 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 24, 2025Standard1 finding
  • Dec 22, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Jan 5, 2022Standard2 findings
  • Jun 24, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Aug 1, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • May 1, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Jul 5, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 20, 2017Standard3 findings
Show the 11 earlier surveys
  • Apr 15, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 18, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Jun 5, 2014Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 5, 2014Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 15, 2014—7 findings
  • Sep 17, 2013—1 finding
  • Nov 29, 2012—3 findings
  • Jul 3, 2012—1 finding
  • Sep 30, 2011—10 findings
  • Feb 16, 2011—6 findings
  • Jul 14, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction