Deficiency Index

Temecula Healthcare Center

Temecula, California · CCN 555923

22 surveys since 2021, 1 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
42
Surveys
22
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2021–2026
’21’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file4/22

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
115
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
GENERATIONS HEALTHCARE
County
Riverside
Medicare-certified since
2021

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 110 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Jul 28, 2026

104 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.864.16
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.76—
Annual nurse turnover34.2%37.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$17,765 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L12.7%
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2978.4%E513.5%F25.4%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 37 of the 42 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6895×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F5583×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F6093×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F5732×

    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Temecula Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF880Feb 25, 2024

    Based on document reviews, interviews, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines/recommendations, and the facility policy, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to prevent the transmission of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) to staff and residents on 4 of 4 units. Specifically, the facility failed to conduct contact tracing (identification and monitoring of individuals who have been exposed to a disease to prevent further spread) for staff during an outbreak of COVID-19. The facility determined usage of N95 respirators (source control) negated the CDC recommendation/guidelines for testing individuals' exposure to COVID-19. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 17, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices when: 1. One sandwich snack was observed to be expired; 2. One dispensing scoop was left inside the container and not stored outside or on top of the mashed potato powder; 3. The kitchen door located near the garbage container area was left open for 20 minutes; and 4. Three garbage containers did not have covers. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness (stomach illness acquired from ingesting contaminated food) among a vulnerable population of 112 out of 115 residents who received food prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Feb 25, 2024

    Based on observation, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to chicken was thawed in a safe manner for 106 of 113 sampled residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled General HACCP [Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point] Guidelines for Food Safety, with a copyright date of 2017 revealed, 6. Safe Thawing Practices a. Thaw meat, fish and or poultry in a refrigerator in a drip proof container and in a way that prevents cross contamination. b. Completely submerge the item in clean running water that is running fast enough to agitate and float off loose ice particles. c. Thaw the item in a microwave oven using the defrost mode if it is to be cooked immediately after thawing. d. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF578Apr 17, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, 11 of 14 residents reviewed for Advance Directive (AD - written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment) (Residents 13, 17, 19, 70, 78, 84, 90, 97, 319, 320, and 322) a copy of the AD was available and the resident or their resident representative (RP) had been provided follow up information regarding the formulation of an AD. These failures had the potential to result in the ADs for Residents 13, 17, 19, 70, 78, 84, 90, 97, 319, 320, and 322 not being readily accessible to staff and physicians, which could lead to the residents' wishes regarding medical treatment being unknown and ultimately not honored. Findings: 1. On April 14, 2025, at 3:58 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 70. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF695Apr 17, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the policy and procedures for oxygen use for two of two sampled residents (Resident 17 and 70) when: 1. Resident 70 was observed receiving continuous oxygen at an incorrect flow rate, without proper documentation or assessment; and 2. Resident 17 had an unlabeled nasal cannula (oxygen tubing - a device that delivers oxygen). These failures had the potential to result in unnecessary or unsafe oxygen administration and increased risk of infection for Residents 17 and 70. Findings: 1. On April 14, 2025, at 2:21 p.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted for Resident 70. Resident 70 was alert, oriented and able to verbalize his needs. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 42 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 28, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 25, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 5, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 31, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 23, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 30, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 17, 2025Standard8 findings
  • Mar 3, 2025Complaint3 findings
Show the 14 earlier surveys
  • Jan 28, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 24, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 10, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 29, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 15, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 25, 2024Standard6 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 22, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 18, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 13, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 6, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 26, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 23, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 24, 2022Infection control1 finding
  • Oct 6, 2021Infection control2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction