Park View Post Acute
Santa Rosa, California · CCN 056411
41 surveys since 2011, 10 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 159
- Surveys
- 41
- Harm or worse
- 10
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 116
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- THE ENSIGN GROUP
- County
- Sonoma
- Medicare-certified since
- 1975
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 110 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in California.
Last survey on record
Mar 5, 2026
249 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.49 | 4.16 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.48 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 30.1% | 37.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $9,347 across 1 penalty
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G12.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2251.2% | E1841.9% | F24.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5503×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6583×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Park View Post Acute, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Jan 30, 2026
Based on observation, interviews, including a Santa [NAME] Police Department Detective interview, and facility record reviews, the facility failed to protect one resident (Resident 1) of a census of 115 and sample of 77 interviewable residents, to be free from sexual abuse, when Licensed Staff B witnessed Unlicensed Staff A touching his exposed penis against Resident 1's naked body during care.This failure to protect Resident 1 from Unlicensed Staff A resulted in Resident 1 stating she told Unlicensed Staff A to stop, and it made her feel uncomfortable, and would make a reasonable person, who suffered from sexual assault by a facility staff member, to experience fear, guilt, shame, isolation, dehumanization and humiliation as a result of the sexual abuse. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 5, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food under sanitary conditions and in accordance with professional standards for a census of 116 when:Nonstick pans used in food preparation were visibly scratched, compromising the integrity of the cookware and increasing the risk of nonstick coating flaking into food;A manual can opener had missing metal on the tip, creating a potential physical contaminant hazard during food preparation; andItems in the refrigerators were not marked with an open date or delivery date.These failures had the potential to contribute to the spread of foodborne illnesses among a vulnerable resident population.1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF842Mar 5, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect resident health information for a census of 116 when dietary tickets were disposed of in the facility's regular trash.This failure decreased the facility's potential to protect and safeguard resident confidentiality and personal privacy.During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/2/26 at 9:17 a.m. with the Food & Nutrition Director (FND), in the kitchen dishwashing area, a dietary aid (DA) was observed removing trays from the soiled tray carts to prepare them to be washed. The DA sorted the tray contents and threw residents' dietary tickets into the garbage can along with scraps of food. The FND stated residents' dietary tickets were thrown into the garbage with food scraps. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF760Apr 29, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of medication errors when one of three sampled residents (Resident 3) was not given the correct dosage of a medication, Uptravi (generic name selexipag) a medication used to treat pulmonary hypertension (high blood pressure in the arteries that carry blood from the heart to the lungs). This failure had the potential for Resident 3 to have a drug overdose causing physical problems ranging from pain, rashes, weakness, organ failure, (when organs in the body such as the heart, lungs, kidneys or liver are unable to perform their critical functions), seizures or even death. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550May 17, 2024
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the rights of five (5) unsampled residents (Resident 20, Resident 55, Resident 69, Resident 76 & Resident 63) and three (3) of 24 sampled residents (Resident 3, Resident 51 & Resident 42) were honored and respected, when: 1) facility staff did not answer or respond to call lights or call for assistance, making residents wait for 20 minutes or more; 2) the facility did not follow its Smoking Policy, when Resident 42 wheeled himself across the facility's parking lot to smoke without staff supervision, and; 3) facility staff entered and exited the building using the slider doors in the residents' rooms that opened to the back patio. […]
Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 159 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 5, 2026Standard8 findings
- Jan 30, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 3, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jul 17, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jun 2, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Apr 29, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jan 14, 2025Complaint2 findings
- May 17, 2024Standard and complaint15 findings
Show the 33 earlier surveys
- Apr 5, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Feb 14, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 20, 2023Complaint3 findings
- Oct 13, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Sep 8, 2022Complaint1 finding
- May 3, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Feb 22, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Nov 5, 2021Standard and complaint14 findings
- Oct 12, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Aug 17, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Nov 18, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Oct 21, 2019Standard and complaint12 findings
- Oct 15, 2018Standard and complaint10 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 6, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Nov 20, 2017Standard3 findings
- Oct 28, 2016Standard5 findings
- Sep 29, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Aug 23, 2016Complaint1 finding
- May 19, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Feb 5, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 22, 2015Standard11 findings
- Sep 8, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Oct 27, 2014Standard5 findings
- Jan 10, 2014—1 finding
- Nov 25, 2013—7 findings
- Jul 23, 2013—3 findings
- Oct 29, 2012—13 findings
- Oct 15, 2012—2 findings
- May 18, 2012—1 finding
- Apr 12, 2012—1 finding
- Mar 15, 2012—3 findings · 2 harm
- Nov 16, 2011—1 finding
- Aug 4, 2011Standard16 findings · 4 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction