Sweet Memorial Nursing Home
Chinook, Montana · CCN 275127
12 surveys since 2014, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 103
- Surveys
- 12
- Harm or worse
- 9
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 42
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Blaine · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1989
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 25 facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Montana.
Last survey on record
Jan 29, 2026
284 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.95 | 4.12 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.95 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 51.1% | 52.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $28,243 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G12.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2250.0% | E1943.2% | F24.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6574×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F6103×
Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6002×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Sweet Memorial Nursing Home, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF692Jan 29, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to routinely monitor and document a resident's weight in the resident's record, failed to ensure comprehensive quarterly nutritional assessments were completed timely to analyze and evaluate related factors for a severe weight loss, and failed to revise a residents care plan to prevent an avoidable weight loss for 2 (#s 15 and 20) of 20 residents sampled. Resident #15 had a severe 9.75% weight loss in the last three months, and 17% in the last six months. Resident #20 had a severe 6% weight loss in 29 days, and a severe 8% weight loss of her body weight in 92 days. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents at risk for nutritional deficit. Findings include:1. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Dec 7, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent a resident from eloping and wandering the facility from the facility for 1 (#12) failed to implement interventions for #12's wandering behaviors causing resident's to be upset, for 2 (#s 12 and 15) of 4 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of a facility reported incident regarding resident #12, dated 6/3/22, showed, Facility under COVID outbreak lockdown since Tuesday 5/31/22. Residents are all a little out of sorts being isolated to their rooms. Also, this resident is normally quite busy and does roam around the facility, occasionally trying to open the doors. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Sep 2, 2021
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect 1 (#32) from resident to resident abuse with injury by resident (#82); failed to protect 1 (#7) from alleged abuse with injury; and failed to protect 1 (#00) from neglect, of 5 sampled and supplemental residents. Findings include: 1. Record review of resident #82's Care Plan, dated 2/14/20, showed a concern for: Behavioral Symptoms: Angry outbursts, inappropriate physical behavior and inappropriate verbal behavior. Evidenced by: No concept of what is dangerous, left family while on a (sic) outing and ended up hurt and in jail. Punched a CNA in the face while trying to elope. Curses and yells at residents and staff. Threatened resident that he would kill her after she provoked him . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Dec 6, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to complete proper hand hygiene during resident medication pass, properly wear masks during a facility outbreak of COVID-19, and sanitize a mechanical lift after resident use, prior to storing. This deficient practice has the potential to spread infection to all residents in the facility. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 12/5/23 at 8:46 a.m., staff member R was observed passing medication to multiple residents without performing hand hygiene between residents. Staff member R said she knows she was not good about performing hand hygiene and should be either hand sanitizing or doing a full wash with soap and water. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF881Dec 6, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have an antibiotic stewardship program in place. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 12/4/23 at 2:06 p.m., staff member A stated the facility was in outbreak status for COVID-19. Staff member A stated no residents tested positive, but one staff member was positive. During an interview on 12/4/23 at 3:06 p.m., staff members A and B stated they would be the back up for the infection prevention program. Staff members A and B were unsure how staff member H was tracking antibiotics, or what kind of criteria or programs she used. […]
Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 103 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 29, 2026Standard13 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 7, 2025Complaint6 findings
- Dec 5, 2024Standard and complaint13 findings
- Dec 6, 2023Standard and complaint12 findings
- Dec 7, 2022Standard and complaint11 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 2, 2021Standard8 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 31, 2019Standard5 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 4, 2018Standard7 findings · 2 harm
Show the 4 earlier surveys
- Jun 8, 2017Standard8 findings · 2 harm
- Apr 14, 2016Standard5 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 12, 2015Standard9 findings
- Jan 16, 2014—6 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction