Deficiency Index

Powder River Manor

Broadus, Montana · CCN 275087

18 surveys since 2011, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
107
Surveys
18
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/18

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
41
Ownership
Government - County
Chain
Independent
County
Powder River · rural
Medicare-certified since
1977

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 25 facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Montana.

Last survey on record

Apr 22, 2026

201 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.324.12
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.37—
Annual nurse turnover39.3%52.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$48,318 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG28.0%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1768.0%E312.0%F312.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 25 of the 107 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6582×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F5771×

    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.

  • F5781×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F6001×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Powder River Manor, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF689Mar 2, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a proactive beneficial system in place for the prevention of falls for all residents, to include specifically those at heightened risk of falls, due to their past history of recurring falls, and: - failed to identify the direct root causes of falls for the implementation of individualized interventions; - failed to assess fall events and details comprehensively and ensure fall documentation was in place and consistent across disciplines; - failed to ensure staff had the necessary tools and knowledge to provide fall prevention interventions on an ongoing daily basis; - failed to ensure resident care plans were updated with interventions related to fall safety and address the resident's current medical,… […]

  • Actual harm, patternF657Mar 2, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise interventions on the resident's plan of care after multiple falls for 8 (#s 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 17, 19, and 22) of 8 sampled residents. This deficient practice affected half of the facility resident population, and had the potential to further increase the risk of falls, with or without injury, for the vulnerable or non vulnerable residents, and act proactively for preventing the falls vs being reactive and responding to the falls. Findings include: Refer to F689 - Free of Accident Hazards/supervision/devices for detailed fall information. 1. Review of resident #22's Brief Interview for Mental Status exam, dated 5/7/22, showed she scored a 0, for severe cognitive impairment. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF726Mar 13, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were performing cares within their scope of practice; failed to ensure sufficient supervision; and failed to ensure nursing staff performed adequate pain assessment and ongoing monitoring for the application of a heat pack for 1 (#9) of 16 sampled residents. The facility's failures resulted in the development of a partial thickness facial burn for one resident and increased the risk of serious injuries for any resident in need of heat pack application. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Mar 14, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development and progression of a pressure wound, for 1 (#4) of 1 sampled resident with a Stage 3 sacral pressure wound. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 3/12/24 at 2:10 p.m., resident #4 was seated in a recliner in her room, leaning toward the left arm of the chair. A pressure relieving chair pad was observed on the chair. An air mattress was observed on resident #4's bed. Resident #4 stated she had a butt sore, which made it hard to sit up straight in the chair. Resident #4 stated, I got that new (air) mattress on the bed and this (pressure relieving chair pad) thing not too long ago, but I don't think they are helping much. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Mar 13, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was used for 3 (#s 5, 12, and 18); failed to ensure clean medical equipment (lifts) between resident uses for 2 (#s 12 and 18); failed to properly clean blood glucose monitor for 1 (#5); failed to provide effective education related to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) throughout the facility, and failed to implement the appropriate use of enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 1 (#9) of 16 sampled residents. The deficient practices increases the risks of infection for all residents receiving care within the facility. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 3/11/25 at 3:58 p.m., staff member E and F were toileting resident #18, using the sit-to-stand lift. […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 107 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 22, 2026Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Sep 10, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 13, 2025Standard and complaint12 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 31, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 14, 2024Standard6 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 2, 2023Standard and complaint4 findings · 2 harm
  • Mar 16, 2022Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Apr 15, 2021Standard3 findings
Show the 10 earlier surveys
  • Oct 19, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Oct 1, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • May 2, 2019Standard8 findings
  • Mar 9, 2018Standard5 findings
  • Nov 3, 2016Standard6 findings
  • Aug 13, 2015Standard11 findings
  • Jul 31, 2014Standard6 findings
  • Jun 20, 2013—11 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 19, 2012—7 findings · 1 harm
  • May 12, 2011—14 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction