Deficiency Index

Sunnyside Nursing Home

Sarasota, Florida · CCN 106053

9 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
23
Surveys
9
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file7/9

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
60
Ownership
Non profit - Church related
Chain
Independent
County
Sarasota
Medicare-certified since
2003

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

May 30, 2025

528 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.165.05
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.16—
Annual nurse turnover23.1%25.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD375.0%E125.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 4 of the 23 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Sunnyside Nursing Home, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF847May 30, 2025

    Based on resident record review, Health Care Representative and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility's binding arbitration agreement informed the resident or their representative they were not required to agree with arbitration agreement as part of the resident admission to the facility and they could rescind the arbitration agreement within 30 days of signing for 3 (Resident #8, #40 and #404) of 3 residents reviewed who had signed the facility binding arbitration agreement. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880May 30, 2025

    Based on observation, staff interviews, medical record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn for 2 (Residents #32 and #40) of 5 residents observed for enhanced barrier precautions. Enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) are used to prevent the transmission of multi drug resistant organisms (MDRO) and protect vulnerable residents who are at a greater risk of infection transmission during high contact care. The findings included: Review of the facility policy # 4-400-17 titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 4/9/24, implemented to enhance barrier precautions for the prevention of multi-resistant organisms. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF688May 20, 2021

    Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy and procedures, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to implement necessary restorative care to prevent the decline in range of motion or mobility for 1 (Resident #17) of 3 residents reviewed with limited range of motion. The findings included: The facility policy,10-1140 (4/23/18) for Nursing Services Restorative/Maintenance Program specified, the facility shall have a Restorative/Maintenance Program for the purpose of restoring and maintaining optimum level of function for residents at risk. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF695May 20, 2021

    Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedure, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to store continuous positive airway pressure ([CONDITION(S)]) machines masks in a sanitary manner for 1 (Resident #37) of 1 resident who use a [CONDITION(S)] machine (helps you breathe more easily when you sleep). This has the potential to cause respiratory infection. The findings included: A review of the clinical record documented a Physician order [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 23 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 30, 2025Standard2 findings
  • May 20, 2021Standard2 findings
  • Sep 23, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 27, 2017Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Sep 17, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Oct 16, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Sep 19, 2013—4 findings
  • Aug 9, 2012—2 findings
Show the 1 earlier survey
  • Jul 22, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction