Premier Place at the Glenview
Naples, Florida · CCN 105856
6 surveys since 2012, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 13
- Surveys
- 6
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 42
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- LIFE CARE SERVICES
- County
- Collier
- Medicare-certified since
- 1994
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Feb 29, 2024
984 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.75 | 5.05 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.48 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 38.8% | 25.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D375.0% | E125.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Premier Place at the Glenview, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF623Feb 29, 2024
Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide a written copy of the transfer notice to residents and the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) for 2 (Residents #388, and #389) of 28 sampled residents transferred to the hospital and subsequently discharged from the facility. The findings included: The facility policy dated October 2022 titled Transfer or Discharge, Facility Initiated stated, Residents have the right to remain in the facility. Facility initiated transfers and discharges, when necessary, must meet specific criteria and require resident/representative notification and orientation, and documentation as specified in this policy . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF679Feb 29, 2024
Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #19) of 1 resident reviewed for activities, attended activities of their choice to ensure they maintained and/or improved their psychosocial well-being and independence. The findings included: On 2/26/24, observation of Resident #19 at 10:30 a.m., 11:16 a.m., 12:35 p.m., and 3:00 p.m. revealed she was in her room during those observations without the television or radio on. Resident #19 was not observed in any of the facility activities during the day. On 2/27/24, observation of Resident #19 at 8:30 a.m., 9:30 a.m., and 11:00 a.m. revealed she was in her room during those observations without the television or radio on. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF695Feb 29, 2024
Based on observation, interviews, and review of facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to maintain, clean, and store respiratory care equipment in a sanitary manner and in accordance with manufacturer's specifications for 1(Resident #27) of 2 sampled residents with physician's orders for oxygen and breathing treatments. The findings included: Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with primary diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Emphysema (a lung disease that damages the tiny air sacs in the lungs). On 2/26/24 at 10:55 a.m., Resident #27 was observed receiving oxygen through a nasal cannula connected to an oxygen concentrator (medical device that delivers extra oxygen). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF761Jun 23, 2022
Based on observation, staff interview, review of facility's policy and procedure and manufacturer's specification, the facility failed to ensure appropriate storage and labeling of prescribed medications in one (400 hall cart) of two medication carts observed. The findings included: The facility's Storage of Medications policy (revised November 2020) read, The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Drugs and biologicals are stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received. The facility's Administering Medications (Revised April 2019) read, . […]
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 29, 2024Standard3 findings
- Jun 23, 2022Standard1 finding
- Nov 19, 2020Standard2 findings
- Jun 10, 2015Standard1 finding
- Aug 28, 2012—1 finding
- Jul 20, 2012—5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction