Deficiency Index

Stonehenge of Orem

Orem, Utah · CCN 465167

8 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
16
Surveys
8
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file6/8

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
34
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
THE ENSIGN GROUP
County
Utah
Medicare-certified since
2009
Ownership changed
In the last 12 months

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=2, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Mar 5, 2026

249 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.934.20
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.29—
Annual nurse turnover47.7%57.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 2 of the 16 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Stonehenge of Orem, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Mar 5, 2026

    Based on observation and record review, it was found that the facility failed to handle, store, process, and transport linens so as to prevent the spread of infection and to conduct an annual review of its infection prevention and control program (IPCP) and update their program, as necessary. Specifically, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and laundry staff handled, transported, and processed soiled linens in a way that did not prevent the spread of infection and the facility did not conduct an annual review of its IPCP policies and procedures.Findings included: 1.On 3/2/26 at 9:28 AM, an observation was made of CNA 1 donning personal protective equipment (PPE) to enter room [ROOM NUMBER], which was an isolation room for influenza. CNA 1 was observed to put on a gown, mask, and gloves. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF755Mar 14, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident. Specifically, the facility did not have a process in place to destroy narcotics when not administered to the residents. Resident identifiers: 129 and 130. Findings included: On 3/13/24 at 8:30 AM, an observation was made of the facility medication cart located on the South hallway with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1. The following medications were observed inside: a. […]

Read all 16 findings in full →

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 5, 2026Standard1 finding
  • Mar 14, 2024Standard1 finding
  • Dec 19, 2018Standard6 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 12, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Jun 23, 2016Standard1 finding
  • May 12, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Apr 9, 2013—1 finding
  • Apr 28, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction