Stonehenge of Orem
Orem, Utah · CCN 465167
8 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 16
- Surveys
- 8
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 34
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- THE ENSIGN GROUP
- County
- Utah
- Medicare-certified since
- 2009
- Ownership changed
- In the last 12 months
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=2, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Mar 5, 2026
249 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.93 | 4.20 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.29 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 47.7% | 57.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2100.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Stonehenge of Orem, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Mar 5, 2026
Based on observation and record review, it was found that the facility failed to handle, store, process, and transport linens so as to prevent the spread of infection and to conduct an annual review of its infection prevention and control program (IPCP) and update their program, as necessary. Specifically, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and laundry staff handled, transported, and processed soiled linens in a way that did not prevent the spread of infection and the facility did not conduct an annual review of its IPCP policies and procedures.Findings included: 1.On 3/2/26 at 9:28 AM, an observation was made of CNA 1 donning personal protective equipment (PPE) to enter room [ROOM NUMBER], which was an isolation room for influenza. CNA 1 was observed to put on a gown, mask, and gloves. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF755Mar 14, 2024
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident. Specifically, the facility did not have a process in place to destroy narcotics when not administered to the residents. Resident identifiers: 129 and 130. Findings included: On 3/13/24 at 8:30 AM, an observation was made of the facility medication cart located on the South hallway with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1. The following medications were observed inside: a. […]
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 5, 2026Standard1 finding
- Mar 14, 2024Standard1 finding
- Dec 19, 2018Standard6 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 12, 2017Standard3 findings
- Jun 23, 2016Standard1 finding
- May 12, 2015Standard1 finding
- Apr 9, 2013—1 finding
- Apr 28, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction