Deficiency Index

Pine View Transitional Rehab

South Ogden, Utah · CCN 465155

8 surveys since 2011, 1 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
24
Surveys
8
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file6/8

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
30
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
ADVANCED HEALTH CARE
County
Weber
Medicare-certified since
2004

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=6, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Apr 16, 2025

572 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.844.20
Registered-nurse hours per resident day2.07—
Annual nurse turnover50.9%57.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD4100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 4 of the 24 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Pine View Transitional Rehab, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF886Jul 7, 2021

    Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 13 sampled resident, that the facility did not test residents and facility staff based on the identification of any individual identified as diagnosed with COVID-19 in the facility. Specifically, a resident was identified as COVID-19 positive after admission and outbreak testing of all staff and residents was not conducted. Resident identifier 1. Findings include: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . On 7/7/21 resident 1's medical records were reviewed. Resident 1's immunization record documented that resident 1 had received the Pfizer vaccine, first dose on 2/4/21 and the second dose on 3/1/21. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jul 7, 2021

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary environment to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, personal protective equipment (PPE) was used by multiple staff members without the proper disinfection between staff use. Findings include: On 7/7/21 at 1:15 PM, an observation was made of resident rooms throughout the facility. Multiple face shields were observed to be hanging outside each door throughout the facility. The face shields were observed to have a foam headpiece. None of the face shields were observed to be labeled with staff names. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF558Apr 16, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations of needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of resident or other residents for 1 of 15 sampled residents. Specifically, a resident was not provided assistive devices for bed mobility. Resident identifier: 13. Findings include: Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on ,d+[DATE]//25 with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic wounds and wedge compression fracture of second lumbar vertebra. On 4/14/25 at 9:32 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 13. Resident 13 stated he used a rail at another facility that helped him with repositioning in bed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Apr 16, 2025

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation abuse or neglect to the State Survey Agency immediately, for 1 of 15 sampled residents. Specifically, an allegation was not reported when a resident reported a nurse yelled at him. Resident identifier: 13. Findings include: Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic wounds, osteomyelitis, and wedge compression fracture of second lumbar vertebra. On 4/14/25 at 9:32 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 13. Resident 13 stated he had to wait for an hour for assistance one night and he was yelling out as loud as he could to get staff attention to assist him in changing his brief. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF610Apr 16, 2025

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse or neglect, for 1 of 15 sampled residents. Specifically, an allegation of a nurse yelling at a resident was not investigated. Resident identifier: 13. Findings include: Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic wounds, osteomyelitis, and wedge compression fracture of second lumbar vertebra. On 4/14/25 at 9:32 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 13. Resident 13 stated he had to wait for an hour for assistance one night and he was yelling out as loud as he could to get staff attention to assist him in changing his brief. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 24 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 16, 2025Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Dec 16, 2021Standard1 finding
  • Jul 7, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 2, 2017Standard4 findings
  • May 24, 2016Standard2 findings
  • Jun 11, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Apr 17, 2013—3 findings
  • Jun 23, 2011—8 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction