Deficiency Index

Stonecroft Health Campus

Bloomington, Indiana · CCN 155838

10 surveys since 2015, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
32
Surveys
10
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2015–2025
’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file8/10

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
70
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES
County
Monroe
Medicare-certified since
2015

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=8, floor 20).

Last survey on record

May 20, 2025

538 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.083.49
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.05—
Annual nurse turnover44.4%48.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD250.0%E250.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 4 of the 32 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Stonecroft Health Campus, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF623Jun 21, 2023

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the written notification required for a transfer and discharge was given to the resident and the resident representative for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization . (Resident 4, Resident 48, Resident 14, Resident 25, Resident 41) Findings include: 1. On 6/19/23 at 11:42 a.m., Resident 4's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnosis included, but was not limited to, elevated white blood cell count. Resident 4's progress notes indicated the resident was sent to the hospital on 4/27/23. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF625Jun 21, 2023

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the notification of the bed-hold policy required for residents who transferred to the hospital was provided in writing to the resident or the residents representative for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization . (Resident 4, Resident 48, Resident 14, Resident 25, Resident 41). Findings include: 1. On 6/19/23 at 11:42 a.m., Resident 4's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnosis included, but was not limited to elevated white blood cell count. Resident 28's progress notes indicated the resident was sent to the hospital on 4/27/23. There was no documentation that a written notice that specified the facility's bed-hold policy was provided to the resident or the resident's representative. 34848 2. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812May 11, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was not stored beneath a water line on which water had condensed for 1 of 2 observations of the kitchen. Findings include: During a tour of the facility's walk-in freezer on 5/9/22 at 10:20 A.M., food was observed to be stored beneath the freezer condenser water line, upon which water had condensed and ice had formed. Beneath the freezer condenser were three pot roasts covered in ice that originated from the condenser water line. During an interview on 5/9/22 at 10:25 A.M., the Dietary Manager indicated the food should not have been kept under the freezer condenser. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF921May 11, 2022

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary and comfortable environment. Resident walls were not free from damage for 2 of 12 rooms reviewed and the facility failed to ensure sit to stand lifts were clean for 5 of 5 residents who use the sit to stand lifts. (Resident 6, Resident 8, Resident 12, Resident 16, Resident 17, Resident 20, Resident 29) Findings include: 1. On 5/5/22 at 12:35 P.M., the wall behind Resident 12's bed headboard was observed to have damage to the drywall and was without paint. 2. On 5/5/22 at 3:00 P.M., the wall left of Resident 16's bedroom window was observed to have damage to the drywall and was without paint. 3. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578May 20, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's choice of code status was documented accurately for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for advanced directives. (Resident 13) Finding includes: On [DATE] at 2:34 p.m., Resident 13's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (condition where you don't have enough oxygen in the tissues in your body), and chronic kidney disease (condition where the kidneys are damaged and can't properly filter waste and fluid from the blood). […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 32 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 20, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Jun 21, 2023Standard2 findings
  • May 11, 2022Standard4 findings
  • Dec 23, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 10, 2020Standard5 findings
  • Dec 11, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Nov 17, 2017Standard6 findings
  • Sep 28, 2017Complaint1 finding
Show the 2 earlier surveys
  • Oct 6, 2016Standard7 findings
  • Dec 22, 2015Complaint2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction